Science as the cure for wonder
Are scientific systems discoveries of how things are, or devices the mind builds to soothe itself? Smith's history of astronomy treats them as the second — machines to quiet the discomfort of surprise.
The prized survivor of the collection is Smith's long essay, kept in a cabinet since his twenties, on the principles that lead and direct philosophical enquiries, illustrated by the history of astronomy. In it he treats scientific theories less as truths than as machines the mind builds to settle the unease of the unexpected: wonder arises, a system is invented to calm it, and it holds until a new anomaly unsettles it and the cycle begins again — from the spheres of the ancients to Newton. It is a strikingly modern psychology of inquiry, and, as the prose has it, where Smith is caught thinking about how thinking works.
- astronomy
- epistemology
- perception
- metaphysics
- imagination
- aesthetics
- nature
- justice
Enter a dialogue
- What does it change for a person's faith in science to hear that theories are machines the mind builds to quiet the discomfort of surprise?
- If a scientific system is only something we build to settle our unease, in what sense is Newton's astronomy any truer than the ancient spheres?
- How is wonder, the jolt of the unexpected, different from the calm a finished theory restores?
- To see every theory as a temporary machine awaiting the anomaly that will unsettle it, what hope of final scientific truth must be given up?
- For someone unsettled by a fact that fits nothing they believe, what does your account of wonder say is happening in them?