The hand before the brain
What turned an ape into a human being — a swelling mind, or working hands? Engels reverses the usual order and makes labour, not thought, the maker of our species.
The single audacious claim of this fragment is that labour, not the brain, made the human being. Apes came down from the trees and stood upright; the freed hand took up tools; skilled hands grew more capable and passed their skill on; and cooperative work gave the creatures something to say, so that speech, and only then the enlarged brain, followed the working hand rather than leading it. Mind is thus the product of social labour, not its cause. Against every account that starts from a superior intellect, Engels roots the human in what its labour has made of it.
- labor
- evolution
- human evolution
- tool use
- language
- consciousness
- materialism
- embodiment
- human-animal distinction
Enter a dialogue
- A person is told they are essentially their mind — what does your claim that labour made us give them to think about who they are?
- Making the hand the maker of the mind just swaps one crude cause for another — why is labour a less arbitrary start than the brain?
- How would you tell the work that genuinely made us human from the mere tool-use some animals also manage?
- If mind is the product of social labour and not its cause, what flattering picture of human reason must a reader set down?
- Someone finds meaning in the idea that their work shaped them, not just occupied them — is that what you mean by labour making us?