Religion born of dependence
Where does the sense of a power greater than oneself come from, before any idea of God? Feuerbach roots it in the plain dependence of a creature on the things it cannot live without.
Feuerbach traces religion to the feeling of dependence — but not the refined absolute dependence Schleiermacher had made the ground of faith. He means the ordinary dependence of a living creature on the sun, the earth, the water it needs to survive. Out of that felt need, and the fear and gratitude bound up with it, religion is born. This answers a question his famous earlier book had left open: where the sense of a higher power comes from before any human essence is projected. Faith begins not in a special religious intuition but in the bare condition of being a needy natural creature.
- religion
- theology
- nature
- naturalism
- dependence
- mortality
- political theology
- causation
Enter a dialogue
- What does it mean for a person's sense of the sacred to trace it back to plain dependence on the sun, earth and water they need?
- Isn't grounding religion in the feeling of dependence too crude — many believers feel gratitude and awe, not mere need?
- How is the dependence you describe different from Schleiermacher's absolute dependence, which he made the very ground of faith?
- To locate the root of religion in ordinary creaturely need, what nobler origin of faith must a reader be willing to give up?
- For someone who feels small before nature yet calls themselves unreligious, what does your account say they are already feeling?