Already Free
Janaka asks how freedom is won and is told that nothing needs winning. What remains open is whether a person can live from that freedom instead of toward it.
Freedom, for the Aṣṭāvakra of the Gītā, is not a state reached at the end of discipline but a fact mistaken for its opposite. The self is the witness of body, mind and elements, neither doer nor enjoyer, and the world appears on it as a snake appears on a rope at dusk. Against every path of gradual effort, the verses make the belief that one is bound into the bondage itself, so no practice, scripture or meditation can produce what is already there, and each can postpone it.
- nonduality
- liberation
- self-knowledge
- consciousness
- appearance and reality
- bondage and liberation
- ignorance
- self-realization
- knowledge
- meditation
- spiritual practice
Enter a dialogue
- A king asks how to win freedom, and you tell him he is free already. If nothing has to be gained, what was he actually missing?
- Even sitting down to meditate, you warn the king, is his bondage. Why would the practice meant to free a person be what binds him?
- Whoever takes themselves to be free is free, and whoever takes themselves to be bound is bound. Is freedom then nothing more than a change of mind?
- Pleasure and pain, you tell the king, belong to the mind and not to him. Can someone in real grief stand back as a mere witness?
- After a few verses Janaka cries out in wonder at his own boundless self. Is that sudden astonishment proof he has understood, or a new trap?