The Religion of Humanity
Can a society hold together on science alone, without anything to revere? Comte says no, and builds a religion whose object of worship is not God but the human species itself.
The man who had spent six volumes banishing religion from knowledge here founds one. Humanity — the Great Being, made of all who have lived and served the species — becomes the object of a positivist worship complete with priesthood, sacraments and a calendar renamed for Homer, Aristotle and Descartes. Comte's argument is that no order coheres on intellect alone; people need shared reverence and ritual, and these can be supplied without the supernatural. The turn split his followers for good: Mill and Littré kept the science and treated the church as a great mind's aberration, while the devout carried the faith forward.
- positivism
- spiritual power
- humanity
- theology
- synthesis
- social order
- social regeneration
- public opinion
Enter a dialogue
- Someone has lost their faith but still misses the ritual and reverence it gave them — does your Religion of Humanity actually fill that place?
- A church with priests and sacraments but no God looks like the form of religion with its heart cut out — why is it not?
- How is worshipping Humanity as the Great Being different from the abstract essences you spent six volumes teaching us to give up?
- If a society truly needs shared reverence to hold together, what hope in reason standing on its own must a positivist abandon?
- A person can honour the good people who came before them without kneeling to them — why does that honour have to become worship?