The Religion of Humanity
Can a society hold together on science alone, without anything to revere? Comte says no, and builds a religion whose object of worship is not God but the human species itself.
The man who had spent six volumes banishing religion from knowledge here founds one. Humanity — the Great Being, made of all who have lived and served the species — becomes the object of a positivist worship complete with priesthood, sacraments and a calendar renamed for Homer, Aristotle and Descartes. Comte's argument is that no order coheres on intellect alone; people need shared reverence and ritual, and these can be supplied without the supernatural. The turn split his followers for good: Mill and Littré kept the science and treated the church as a great mind's aberration, while the devout carried the faith forward.
- positivism
- spiritual power
- humanity
- theology
- synthesis
- social order
- social regeneration
- public opinion
Enter a dialogue
- Someone has lost their faith but still misses the ritual and reverence it gave them — does your Religion of Humanity actually fill that place?
- You keep prayer in the Religion of Humanity but drop the asking, leaving only a solemn outpouring of noble feeling. Who is the prayer addressed to?
- Your Great Being, Humanity, is made of separable parts held together only by mutual love. What happens to it when people stop loving one another?
- Many take positivism for atheism, yet atheism is, on your account, an imperfect freedom that keeps chasing theological puzzles. What do you do with God instead?
- You say honourable conduct's best reward is lasting esteem, even when it arrives only after death. Is that enough for someone who is dying?