Ren, and the person worth becoming
What does it take to become fully human, not merely well-behaved? The Analects returns endlessly to ren, the humaneness that shows in how a person treats others.
At the centre stands ren, humaneness or fellow-feeling, which Confucius will not define once and for all but shows differently to each student who asks, because what it demands depends on who is asking. It is close by: want to be humane, and you are already near it. Around ren gather the junzi's other marks, integrity, sincerity, doing right for its own sake rather than for advantage, and a lifelong labour of self-cultivation and study, since learning without reflection is wasted and reflection without learning is perilous. The exemplary person does the right thing when no one rewards it, and measures themselves before measuring others.
- virtue
- character
- integrity
- sincerity
- humility
- righteousness
- self-cultivation
- learning
- education
Enter a dialogue
- For a person who behaves correctly but feels nothing behind it, are they becoming humane, or only learning to seem so?
- Learning without thought is labour lost, you say, and thought without learning is perilous. Why is thinking on your own dangerous, not merely useless?
- Your student Zigong says he never does to others what he would not want done to himself. You answer that he has not reached that. Why?
- Two students ask whether to act at once on what they hear. You tell one to consult his elders first and the other to act immediately. Why?
- You seldom spoke of profit, fate or perfect virtue, we are told, yet ren, humaneness, is the idea this book returns to endlessly. How can both be true?