Government, opinion, and political stability
Can political authority rest on anything firmer than force, and how can liberty survive the passions that unsettle rule? The answer determines whether political change repairs a society or breaks its customs, laws, and public trust.
Hume argues that government survives less by force than by opinion, habit, and perceived interest. In Essays such as Of the First Principles of Government and Of Liberty and Despotism, he rejects the claim that political obedience rests on an original contract, while resisting the opposite fantasy that power needs no justification. History shows how authority hardens into custom; moderation, law, and divided power can preserve liberty, whereas faction, ideology, and political passion unsettle it. His target is abstract political purity.
- history
- human nature
- authority
- political philosophy
- liberty
- justice
- moderation
- persuasion
- political change
- tradition
- political stability
- law
- emotion
- democracy
- monarchy
- constitutionalism
- rhetoric
- political institutions
- republicanism
- civil liberty
- eloquence
- political authority
Enter a dialogue
- A constitution should assume every official is a knave who follows only private interest. How can that maxim be true in politics yet false about real people?
- The crown wins members of parliament with favours and offices. Critics call it corruption, yet in your view some of it keeps king and parliament in balance. Why?
- Fear breeds superstition and powerful priests. Proud zeal claiming God's direct inspiration breeds enthusiasm, and Quakers admit no priests. Why is the wilder faith friendlier to liberty?
- Britons may openly criticise the king and his ministers in print, which almost no other country allows. Why does a government shared by king and people permit it?
- People know justice keeps the peace, yet a trivial temptation nearby often beats a great gain far away. If that weakness is incurable, why do magistrates help?