The hand before the brain
What turned an ape into a human being — a swelling mind, or working hands? Engels reverses the usual order and makes labour, not thought, the maker of our species.
The single audacious claim of this fragment is that labour, not the brain, made the human being. Apes came down from the trees and stood upright; the freed hand took up tools; skilled hands grew more capable and passed their skill on; and cooperative work gave the creatures something to say, so that speech, and only then the enlarged brain, followed the working hand rather than leading it. Mind is thus the product of social labour, not its cause. Against every account that starts from a superior intellect, Engels roots the human in what its labour has made of it.
- labor
- evolution
- human evolution
- tool use
- language
- consciousness
- materialism
- embodiment
- human-animal distinction
Enter a dialogue
- No ape's hand has ever made even the crudest stone knife, though its bones and muscles match ours. What did ages of work do to the human hand?
- Making the hand the maker of the mind just swaps one crude cause for another — why is labour a less arbitrary start than the brain?
- You wrote that humans could not have come about without meat, vegetarians permitting. How did a meat diet help build the human brain?
- Working together gave early humans something to say to one another, and throat and mouth slowly adapted. Why would speech follow work, not lead it?
- Because planners could have others carry out the work, people came to credit the head for civilisation. Why did that habit blind Darwin's followers to labour's role?