Whether thought can reach the fact of being
Can reason reach the fact that anything exists, or does it only unfold what is necessary in thought? Schelling comes to doubt that reason reaches being at all without first letting go of itself.
By 1821 Schelling had published almost nothing for a decade, and Hegel commanded the field. These opening lectures state the doubt his whole late thought turns on: systematic reason can tell you what a thing must be if it exists, but never that it exists; the sheer fact of being slips through its net. Reason cannot storm being from the front. The knowing subject has to release its grip on itself, a stepping-outside he calls an ecstasy of reason, before what genuinely is can be received rather than deduced. It is the hinge where German Idealism first turns against its own faith that thought and being are one.
- subjectivity
- identity
- necessity
- form
- freedom
- knowledge
- dialectics
- consciousness
- epistemology
Enter a dialogue
- Geometers have agreed since Euclid, while philosophers breed new systems daily. Why is that conflict, for you, philosophy's raw material and not its shame?
- Only like knows like, as an eye must be sunlike to see light. Why must the eternal freedom behind all things already live in us to be known?
- Ecstasy, meaning a stepping outside oneself, can lead to sense or to senselessness, you say. Which kind must a philosopher go through, and why?
- Most people walk through life without reflection, yet an inner conflict works in them unnoticed, this lecture holds. What would waking to that conflict look like?
- Kant shows our finite understanding cannot know the divine. What does he still take for granted, on your account, about how the divine would have to be known?