Where the absolute becomes visible
How can the absolute, the point where subject and object, freedom and necessity are one, appear at all in a finite world? Schelling answers that it appears in the work of art, and nowhere else so fully.
Philosophy can think the absolute but never make it an object; Schelling argues the work of art can. In art an idea takes on sensuous shape without ceasing to be infinite, so that freedom and necessity, the ideal and the real, are held together in one visible thing. This makes art not illustration but organon, the very organ through which the absolute becomes an object for us, and, in his phrase, the eternal document of what philosophy can only think. The move raised art from decoration to the center of Idealism, a standing Hegel would soon deny it.
- aesthetics
- ontology
- metaphysics
- unity
- identity
- freedom
- necessity
- being
- mythology
- beauty
Enter a dialogue
- A person is moved by a piece of music far past anything they can explain. What does your philosophy say is actually reaching them?
- Isn't calling art the highest organ of philosophy a flattery of artists that no argument really earns?
- How does art make the absolute present in a way that thought, on your account, never can?
- To treat a painting as the eternal document of what philosophy can only think, what modest view of art must a reader abandon?
- You place art above philosophy's own reach. Doesn't that leave the philosopher explaining a thing he admits he cannot match?