The philosophy that starts from existence
A rational system can tell you what a thing must be if it exists; can it ever tell you that it exists? Schelling's positive philosophy begins where deduction ends, from being that is simply given.
The lectures give the fullest statement of Schelling's late positive philosophy. Pure reason, he holds, unfolds essences, what a thing must be, and can prove necessity within thought, but the sheer fact that the world is, and that a God freely creates rather than logically unfolds, lies outside what reason can deduce. Positive philosophy therefore does not deduce existence; it starts from it, and follows the free acts of a living God through history. This reverses the usual order of proof, and it is why revelation, not logic, becomes philosophy's proper material at its highest reach.
- ontology
- epistemology
- causality
- methodology
- teleology
- absolute
- unity
Enter a dialogue
- Someone accepts every argument for why the world must be as it is, yet still feels the mystery that it is at all. Does your philosophy meet that?
- Isn't a philosophy that begins from bare existence, instead of proving it, just refusing to do the work reason demands?
- How would you tell knowing what a thing must be apart from knowing that it actually is?
- What certainty that reason can master everything must a thinker abandon to make room for a God who acts freely?
- If existence can't be deduced, what keeps your positive philosophy from being the mere assertion of whatever happens to be?