How Anything Is Known
Before any argument can be settled, someone has to say what counts as knowing. The sūtras ask which roads lead to knowledge and whether the doubter who denies them all can even speak.
Four roads are named: perception, inference, comparison and the word of a reliable person. Perception is defined strictly, as what arises when a sense meets its object, does not go astray and is not yet put into words. Against the skeptic who says no means of knowledge can be established in time, Gautama replies that the denial needs the very means it denies, and that a means of knowing, like a lamp's light, shows itself while showing other things.
- perception
- inference
- epistemology
- testimony
- knowledge
- cognition
- doubt
- evidence
- sense perception
- time
Enter a dialogue
- A skeptic says no proof can work, since it comes neither before its object, nor after, nor with it. Why does his own denial fail the same test?
- A lamp's light needs no second lamp to be seen. Why does that answer someone who asks what proves the ways of proving?
- Someone hears a claim from a trustworthy expert and has no way to check it. When does that word count as knowledge for you?
- Perception, in your definition, comes from a sense meeting its object, does not go astray and is not yet put into words. Why must it be wordless?
- Doubt arises, by your account, when two things share features or when people disagree. Why does logic count doubt among its topics rather than its failures?