AbbessFrance

Heloise

The abbess who would not be praised for her chastity

2 works · 215 passages grounded

Lifespan
~1100–1164
Also known as
Héloïse d'Argenteuil
Wikipedia

The mind

Peter Abelard, one of the most famous teachers in Paris, knew of his future pupil before he met her. He wrote afterwards that she was supreme in the abundance of her learning, and Peter the Venerable, the abbot of Cluny, later told her that he had known of her reputation since his youth. Heloise had been schooled by the nuns of Argenteuil, outside Paris, and her uncle Fulbert, a canon of the cathedral of Notre-Dame, engaged Abelard as her tutor in the 1110s. What followed was retold for centuries as a romance: an affair, a son named Astralabe, a marriage kept secret, and the night when men sent by Fulbert castrated Abelard. He became a monk at Saint-Denis, and on his order she became a nun at Argenteuil. The poet Jean de Meun put the story into the Roman de la Rose in the thirteenth century, Alexander Pope made a poem of it in 1717, and in 1761 Rousseau named a novel after her.

What survives in her own words is an argument. In the early 1130s Abelard's account of his misfortunes reached her by chance, and she answered it in three letters. Their claim is that an act is worth what the person meant by it, and that what other people can see proves nothing. She reminded Abelard that she had argued against marrying him: a woman who marries a man for his wealth, she wrote, is offering herself for sale, and she would rather be called his whore than the empress of Augustus. She then judged her own life by the same measure. She had taken the veil at his command and not for the love of God, so she expected no reward from God for it. People praised her chastity, but she called herself a hypocrite, because chastity belongs to the mind and her mind still returned to what they had shared.

Abelard's Ethics, written before 1140, rests on the same principle: deeds are indifferent in themselves, and the intention alone decides whether an act is good or bad. Recent scholars, the historian Constant Mews among them, treat the idea as one the two held in common and give Heloise a share in it. For a long time she was given none. From the early nineteenth century some scholars doubted that she had written her letters at all, and in 1972 the historian John Benton argued that the whole collection was a later forgery. He withdrew part of that case in 1980, and most scholars now accept the letters as hers.

Her third letter carries the argument into the convent. The Rule of Benedict, which nuns vowed to follow exactly as monks did, was written for men. She listed the parts of it that a woman cannot keep, pointed out that outward observances are common to hypocrites and the devout alike, and asked Abelard for a rule made for women. He wrote one, along with hymns, sermons and a history of nuns. Some years later she sent him forty-two questions about contradictions and difficulties in the Bible, gathered by her and her nuns, and asked for his answers.

By then she had a house to govern. In 1129 Suger, the abbot of Saint-Denis, had the nuns expelled from Argenteuil, and Abelard gave them the Paraclete, an oratory he had built near Nogent-sur-Seine in Champagne. Heloise led it as abbess for more than three decades, and under her it founded daughter houses. Abelard died in 1142 in a priory of Cluny, and his body was taken to the Paraclete for burial. She died in 1164 and was buried beside him.

Key concepts

What does Heloise mean by saying that intention decides the worth of an act?

That an act is good or bad only through what the person meant by it. It is the disposition of the doer and not the outcome that makes a crime, she writes, and justice weighs the spirit in which a thing is done. Her test case is herself: she became a nun at her husband's command and not for love of God, so she expects no reward from God for a life others admire.

How does Heloise distinguish being the cause of a harm from consenting to it?

Consent makes a person guilty, and being the cause does not. Heloise never agreed to the attack on Abelard, so her mind, she says, is clear of that crime. But it happened on her account, which makes her its cause, and she will not call herself wholly free: earlier sins of her own led to it, and a bad beginning must answer for a bad end. Guilt, for her, follows the will back through a whole life.

What is the difference between wages and thanks in Heloise's account of love?

Wages are owed to someone who gave in order to get, and thanks to someone who gave freely. A woman who marries a man for his wealth, Heloise writes, follows his goods and not him, and is owed wages. She claims the other kind for herself: she wanted Abelard and nothing of his, neither marriage settlement nor dowry. Love, on this view, is proved by what it declines to gain.

Why does Heloise call chastity a virtue of the mind and not of the body?

Because a virtue, for her, is a settled state of the mind, and the body only sometimes shows it. She takes the point from Augustine: Abraham, who had children, was as continent in disposition as the apostle John, who never married. So a body kept pure proves nothing by itself. People who praise her as chaste are praising what they can see, while her thoughts, she says, are still with her old pleasures.

Why does Heloise think a vow should promise less than a person can do?

Because what is promised becomes a debt, and paying a debt earns no credit. Heloise cites Christ's words that servants who have done everything commanded should call themselves useless: they did only what they owed. A person who vows the utmost can at best break even and will probably fall short. One who vows less can add something freely, and only what is freely added counts as a gift.

Why does Heloise hold that scripture must be understood, not just read?

Because a text that is not understood cannot do its work on the reader. She repeats what Abelard taught her nuns: scripture is a mirror in which the soul sees its beauty or its ugliness, and read without understanding it is a mirror set before someone who cannot see. She adds an observation of her own. What her nuns fail to understand they find themselves loving less, so their questions are a duty and not a doubt.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

The intention, not the deed

What is an act worth when everything about it that can be seen is set aside? Heloise answers that only the mind behind it counts, and she tests the answer on herself first.

Justice, she writes, weighs the spirit in which a thing is done and never the thing itself. Outward conduct is shared by the saved and the damned, and no one performs it more eagerly than hypocrites, so no human judge can read a heart from a life. She draws the hard conclusions against herself: a veil taken at a husband's command earns nothing from God, and a penance the mind does not share is no penance. Abelard's Ethics rests on the same principle, and recent scholars give her a share in the idea.

  • intention
  • moral responsibility
  • sin
  • virtue
  • justice
  • punishment
  • repentance

Love, freedom and the marriage bond

Does a marriage protect love or put a price on it? Heloise argued against her own wedding, and years later still preferred love to wedlock and freedom to a bond.

She wanted the man and nothing that came with him, she writes, and held the name of wife less sweet than that of friend. Wanting a husband's goods more than the husband is a sale, owed wages and not thanks. Yet the same letters call in the debt a husband owes his wife, and confess an obedience that put him before God: she would have followed him into hell. Her grief keeps the argument honest. The last of her forty-two questions asks whether a person can sin in doing what God permits, and Abelard's answer turns to desire within marriage.

  • love
  • marriage
  • sexual ethics
  • procreation
  • grief
  • suffering

A rule that fits those who keep it

What is a rule of life for, if those who vow it cannot keep it? Heloise answers that a burden must be measured to its bearer, and that what is done outwardly was never the point.

Discretion, she writes, is the mother of all virtues, and a virtue pushed past its measure counts among the vices. The Rule of Benedict was written for men, and Benedict himself called it a beginning and bent it to his times. So she asks for a rule made for women, and for a principle: food, drink and dress are indifferent things, only sin needs forbidding, and it is wiser to vow less and do more. Her nuns should fulfil the gospel, not try to exceed it. What separates the children of God from the rest is charity alone.

  • monasticism
  • gender
  • law
  • reason
  • humility
  • prayer
  • charity

Scripture put to the question

May a believer cross-examine the book she lives by? Heloise sent her teacher forty-two places where the Bible contradicts itself or seems to ask the unjust, and wanted reasons.

Abelard had taught her nuns that scripture read without understanding is a mirror held before the blind. She took the lesson further than comfort allows: what a reader does not understand, she writes, she is forced to love less. Her model is Marcella, who weighed every answer of her teacher Jerome. The questions press exact difficulties. If we are judged as we judge, what follows from an unjust verdict? How can Christ marvel, when only the surprised marvel? Does the saying about the first stone leave any punishment standing? She sent them in no order, as they came up in the day's reading.

  • biblical interpretation
  • scriptural interpretation
  • scripture
  • gospels
  • language
  • prophecy
  • resurrection
  • eucharist
  • faith
  • grace

By the numbers

works held
2
passages traced
215
concepts traced
335
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “moral responsibility” and “sin”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 7 concepts, joined by 14 pairings. 95 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
moral responsibilitysin7
biblical interpretationsin4
lovemarriage4
marriagevirtue4
marriagemoral responsibility3
lovevirtue2
marriagesin2
scriptural interpretationsin2
biblical interpretationmoral responsibility1
biblical interpretationvirtue1
lovemoral responsibility1
lovescriptural interpretation1
marriagescriptural interpretation1
moral responsibilityscriptural interpretation1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: biblical interpretation in Heloise's Questions, 29.5%.

Density 0% 29.5%

Concept density per work, chronological 2 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 34 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearbiblical interpretationmarriagevirtuelovescriptural interpretationmoral responsibilitysingender
Epistolae ad Petrum Abaelardum1.4%14.5%10.1%14.5%1.4%7.2%4.3%13%
Heloise's Questions29.5%15.8%7.5%2.1%13.7%7.5%9.6%0%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

ABBESS OF THE PARACLETE — LETTERS & QUESTIONS

  1. 1132 lit. Letters to Peter Abelard Epistolae ad Petrum Abaelardum

    Three letters, the second, fourth and sixth of the correspondence that opens with Abelard's account of his misfortunes. These letters are her earlier work; the questions on scripture she sent him followed some years later.

    LA
  2. 1135 Heloise's Questions (Problemata Heloissae cum solutionibus Abaelardi)

    Her later work, and the less read. Where the letters to Abelard speak for her alone, these questions come from the whole community of the Paraclete, and each stands with the answer he sent back.

    LA
Begin a dialogue with Heloise

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.