Not in Words, Not Without Them
Chan claimed to hand on the Buddha's mind without relying on words. Whether a teaching that cannot be said can still be reached only through what is said is what Huihong sets out to prove.
Huihong's first comment states his case: the heart of Chan cannot be seen in words, and it cannot be seen apart from them either. He sets more than a hundred passages from sutras and treatises beside sayings of Linji, Dongshan and Yunmen, and reads each through the other. Against teachers who took the slogan of independence from scripture literally, he calls Linji's phrase a drum smeared with poison, still killing those who hear it two centuries later: words, rightly struck, are the very thing that cuts through.
- language
- conceptual thought
- nonconceptual knowledge
- chan buddhism
- chan
- skillful means
- wisdom
- practice
Enter a dialogue
- You say the heart of Chan cannot be seen in words, and cannot be seen apart from them either. How can both be true at once?
- A sutra tells of a drum smeared with poison that kills all who hear it, and you call Linji's sayings that drum. Why would words need to kill?
- Chan masters claimed to pass on the Buddha's mind without scripture. Why set a sutra passage beside every one of their sayings, as this book does?
- Exiled to an island without a single scripture, you found one verse on a temple wall and broke through. What can one verse do that a library cannot?
- Yunmen hesitated when an old master at the gate shouted at him to speak, was pushed out, and awoke. Was it the words or the shove?