Changing the World, Not Interpreting It
Is the mind a spectator that reflects a world it merely looks upon, or are human beings formed by the practical activity through which they change it? On the answer hangs whether philosophy explains the world or remakes it.
In eleven private notes settling accounts with Feuerbach, Marx rejects a materialism that stays contemplative. People do not gaze at reality; they transform it through practice and are themselves shaped by the conditions they alter — so the human essence is no inner kernel but, as the sixth thesis has it, the ensemble of social relations. Engels found the jottings after Marx's death and printed them in 1888; the eleventh, contrasting interpreting the world with changing it, is carved on his grave in Highgate.
- praxis
- materialism
- social change
- social ontology
- alienation
- truth
- critique of ideology
- historical materialism
Enter a dialogue
- A person tries to change themselves by thinking harder and understanding more — do your theses say that is backwards, that doing comes first?
- Someone believes people are just born the way they are — does your sixth thesis, that we are made by our social relations, give them a different account?
- The eleventh thesis says the point is to change the world, not interpret it — but doesn't changing it well require interpreting it first?
- If the human essence is the ensemble of social relations and no inner kernel, what idea of a private, self-made self does a person have to abandon?
- Feuerbach was a materialist too, yet you broke with him — what does his contemplative version miss that yours insists on?