Hegel's State Turned Right Side Up
Does the state stand above society as reason made flesh, or is it the product of the real people and private interests beneath it? The answer decides whether politics is theology or something a person can change.
Reading Hegel's Philosophy of Right paragraph by paragraph, Marx turns Feuerbach's method against its author: Hegel had made the actual subject — families, needs, the clash of interests — into a mere predicate of the Idea, and crowned monarchy and bureaucracy as its incarnation. Against that mystification Marx sets democracy, where the state is openly the people's own work. The manuscript broke off unpublished and waited eighty years for a reader, but its wager, that material life underlies political form, set the direction of everything he wrote after.
- state
- sovereignty
- monarchy
- democracy
- political theory
- political philosophy
- abstraction
- mystification
- self-consciousness
- metaphysics
- state theory
- civil society
- political constitution
- constitution
- critique of idealism
Enter a dialogue
- Politics feels like weather to most people — something that happens to them, not something they made. Does your quarrel with Hegel change that?
- A citizen votes and pays taxes yet senses the real decisions are made elsewhere — does your critique name what they are feeling?
- Turning Hegel upside down is neat, but why does material life explain the state any better than the Idea did — isn't that just another dogma?
- If the state is only society's own product and not reason made flesh, what reverence for law and authority does a person have to surrender?
- How does your democracy, where the state is openly the people's work, differ from Hegel's constitutional monarchy that also claimed to embody the people's reason?