An Uprising of the Mouth
Should people robbed by their clergy take up arms against them? Luther says no, and the reasons he gives are not the ones the frightened clergy wanted to hear.
Glad that the clergy are afraid, Luther still forbids a rising. It will not come, he predicts, because God himself means to punish them, more severely than any mob could. Insurrection has no reason in it, falls harder on the innocent than the guilty, and is forbidden by God, who keeps vengeance for himself. What remains is to confess one's own sins, pray, and speak: Christ has already begun an uprising with his mouth, and the papacy will be slain by the breath of his word.
- political violence
- nonviolence
- civil disobedience
- social unrest
- divine judgment
- divine justice
- political authority
- religious reform
- eschatology
- justice
Enter a dialogue
- You admit you are glad the clergy fear a rising, and wish their fear were greater still. Why welcome the fear and forbid the rising?
- An uprising, you argue, has no reason in it and usually falls harder on the innocent than on the guilty. Why does that settle the matter for you?
- People ask what they should do if the authorities will not act against the abuses. Why do you answer with confessing their own sins, praying and speaking out?
- The papacy, you predict, will fall by no human hand but by God's own wrath and the breath of Christ's word. Is that patience or simply waiting?
- Whoever strikes back is in the wrong, you say, quoting the proverb, because vengeance belongs to God. Does that leave the wronged with nothing to do?