Education for equal virtue
Can an education that trains girls to please ever make them virtuous? For Wollstonecraft, the answer decides whether women can act as responsible human beings—or whether marriage will keep them dependent ornaments.
Wollstonecraft attacks Rousseau, Fordyce, and Gregory for treating girls as ornaments rather than agents of virtue. She insists that reason and character require the same moral standard for women and men, so education must cultivate judgment, reflection, and independence instead of vanity, concealment, and dependence on a husband. Her target is socialization, not female nature: an agreeable companion cannot become an autonomous person through training designed to please. Published in January 1792, the 87,000-word book turned domesticity into a political question and made equality answerable to education.
- virtue
- education
- reason
- gender
- morality
- rationality
- authority
- duty
- autonomy
- marriage
- power
- character
- sensibility
- independence
- intellect
- equality
- affection
- socialization
- dignity
- nature
- judgment
- domesticity
- gender roles
- vanity
- reflection
- intellectual development
- human nature
- justice
- prejudice
- dependency
Enter a dialogue
- A doctor's much-loved advice to his daughters says any learning should be kept 'a profound secret', especially from men. What does that teach a girl about honesty?
- A woman was raised only to please and now finds she cannot judge for herself. Can reason still be learned late, or is the damage done?
- In Rousseau's book Emile, the girl Sophia is raised to please Emilius, her future husband and master. What do you find unnatural in that plan?
- Spaniels once carried their ears erect, until custom turned a sign of fear into a beauty. What does that say about the charms women are taught?
- You compare girls with young soldiers, who also enter society before principles form. If their education is the same, where is the sexual difference?