Detachment above love itself
Which virtue stands highest? Not love, not humility, Eckhart argues, but detachment, because the heart emptied of every created thing is the one God cannot refuse to enter.
In On Detachment Eckhart makes the case at full stretch that detachment stands above even love and humility. His reasoning is exact: love strives toward God, but detachment simply empties the soul of every created thing and every want, and the utterly empty heart is the one God enters of necessity, drawn as into a vacuum. It is less a feeling than a subtraction, the removal of all clinging until nothing of the created self remains. Set out as argument rather than preached, the doctrine can be weighed, and it is unsparing: the highest thing a person can do is want nothing at all.
- detachment
- transcendence
- self-transcendence
- receptivity
- asceticism
- divine union
- mysticism
Enter a dialogue
- A person has tried for years to love God and feels nothing. Would you really tell them to aim at detachment instead of love?
- Ranking detachment above love sounds cold, even inhuman. How is emptying the heart not simply refusing to feel?
- How does detachment differ from love and humility, which most would place higher?
- If the heart must be empty of every created thing, what attachments that a person calls good must go along with the rest?
- You say God enters the empty heart of necessity, as into a vacuum. Doesn't that make grace something a technique could force?