Why philosophy belongs at the dinner party
Should what is said over wine be forgotten by morning, or written down? Plutarch sides with Plato, Xenophon and Aristotle, and holds that a party without philosophy is worse off than one without a lamp.
A proverb held that a drinking companion with a good memory is hateful. Plutarch, writing to his friend Sosius Senecio, answers that Plato, Xenophon and Aristotle had all recorded what was said at table, and so would he. The preface to the eighth book puts the case at its sharpest: take away the lamp and decent guests behave no worse in the dark, but no light rescues a drinking party given over to ignorance. The ninth book shows the heat of it, at the festival of the Muses kept by his teacher Ammonius, where the rivalry among teachers grew hotter with each cup.
- symposium
- conversation
- wine
- intoxication
- hospitality
- friendship
- humor
- social etiquette
- moderation
- pleasure
Enter a dialogue
- A dinner among friends keeps sliding into gossip or awkward silence. What would you bring to the table to rescue it?
- People drink to relax, not to be examined. Isn't bringing philosophy to a drinking party a way of spoiling the one evening off?
- Teachers of letters, geometry, rhetoric and music sit down together and the rivalry grows hotter with each cup. Is that a dinner going wrong or going right?
- Paulus Aemilius, the Roman general who beat King Perseus, said the same skill builds a fearsome army and a pleasant party. What do the two share?
- Your brother Timon let guests seat themselves, and a vain stranger found no place worthy of his rank. Should a host assign the seats?