Reasoning as Reckoning
Is thinking anything more than adding and subtracting names? If Hobbes is right, a false philosophy is a sum done wrong, and the remedy is to check the accounts.
Philosophy is defined at the start as knowledge of effects gained by reasoning from their causes, and its purpose is power over things. To reason is to compute: the mind adds one idea to another or takes one away, and words fix the result. Names are marks for one’s own memory and signs to others. Only names are universal, and truth belongs to sentences, never to things. Hence the first truths are definitions that the makers of language settled, and a false conclusion is a slip in the reckoning. The schools’ talk of essences is, on this view, a mistake about words.
- language
- logic
- propositions
- reasoning
- definition
- universals
- syllogism
- syllogistic logic
- demonstration
- method
- knowledge
- classification
Enter a dialogue
- Someone sees a distant shape, sees it move, hears it speak, and adds the three ideas into ‘man’. Is that all thinking does, for you?
- The first truths, you write, were made arbitrarily by those who first named things. How can a science of chosen names say anything about the world?
- ‘Man’ names Peter and John one by one, and nothing is universal except names. What do you say to those who think ‘humanity’ a real thing?
- Knowledge is for power, this book declares, and all speculation aims at action. What is a useless truth worth to you?
- Philosophy studies only what comes into being, so you shut the doctrine of God out of it. What may a philosopher then say about God?