What Can Be Measured
Which things can mathematics truly reach, and which only look reached by it? The essay answers with one test, a unit of the thing's own kind, and applies it both to virtue and to the force of moving bodies.
Quantity, Reid argues, is what can be measured, not whatever admits of more and less. Extension, duration, number and proportion are measured by their own kind; velocity and force become mathematical only once a definition ties them to one of these. Pain, pleasure, beauty and virtue have degrees but no unit, so equations of merit only ring changes on words. The same test settles a scandal of mechanics: Newton's followers measured force by velocity, Leibniz's by its square, and each side had simply laid down a different definition, which no experiment can overturn, since no definition can be false.
- measurement
- quantity
- force
- velocity
- definition
- philosophy of physics
- philosophy of mathematics
- mechanics
- scientific method
- pain
- ethics
- virtue
- proportion
- extension
- probability
- mathematical definitions
- scientific disagreement
Enter a dialogue
- Someone in pain can say where it hurts and when it began, but not how much. What stands in the way of the third answer?
- Two people argue for years and neither yields. How can they tell whether they disagree about the facts or only about a definition?
- Formulas once claimed to calculate an act's worth from the good it did and the doer's ability. Why do you say they only shuffle words?
- Some mathematicians measured a moving body's force by its speed, others by its speed squared, each side backed by experiments. Why call that a quarrel about words?
- Dice odds can be counted, yet most probability cannot be measured. What makes a gambler's chance countable but not a witness's reliability?