WorkVācaspati Miśra

Bhāmatī

A reading of Śaṅkara that placed ignorance in each individual self and gave its own name to one of Advaita's two later schools.

by Vācaspati Miśra1,425 passages held

  • Sanskrit, the original language
Original language
Sanskrit

Report a rights issue

Overview

Vācaspati Miśra wrote commentaries for nearly every school of Indian philosophy, and in the closing verses of this one he counts them up: three named books, then his treatises on Nyāya logic, on Sāṃkhya, on Yoga and on Vedānta. The Bhāmatī is a sub-commentary, or ṭīkā: it explains, phrase by phrase and through all four of its books, Ādi Śaṅkara's commentary on the Brahma Sūtras, the aphorisms that arrange the teaching of the Upanishads. Only Vācaspati's own text is given here, not Śaṅkara's commentary, which it explains. Vācaspati worked in Mithilā, in what is now northern Bihar; one of his books carries a year that reads as 841 or as 976 depending on the calendar era meant, so scholars place him in the ninth or the tenth century. The same closing verses name the king under whom he wrote, Nṛga. What sets the book apart is that it reads Śaṅkara alongside Maṇḍana Miśra, the eighth-century Advaita author who was better known than Śaṅkara until about the tenth century. More than once it sends the reader to Vācaspati's own commentaries on two of Maṇḍana's books: the Nyāyakaṇikā on the Vidhiviveka, a treatise on Vedic commands, and the Brahmatattvasamīkṣā on the Brahmasiddhi. The question it answers most influentially is where ignorance resides, if Brahman, the ultimate reality, is all there is. Its answer is the individual self, the jīva. Ignorance belongs to the self, and Brahman is only its object: Brahman is never ignorant, and governs ignorance as the Lord. It also gives meditation the leading part in the path to liberation. The other line of later Advaita grew from Prakāśātman's tenth-century Vivaraṇa, a commentary on the Pañcapādikā of Padmapāda, a pupil of Śaṅkara, and it made Brahman itself the seat of ignorance; later Advaita is usually described as divided between these two, the Bhāmatī and the Vivaraṇa schools. The commentaries kept accumulating. Around 1300 Amalānanda wrote the Kalpataru on the Bhāmatī, and in the sixteenth century Appayya Dīkṣita wrote the Parimala on the Kalpataru. Tradition gives the title as the name of Vācaspati's wife.

Key concepts

What is avidyā, ignorance, in the Bhāmatī?

Avidyā is not a mere lack of information but a positive veil that makes the one consciousness appear as many selves and a world of things. It has no beginning, can be called neither real nor unreal, and ends only with knowledge. Its mark is error: taking the body, mind and their properties for oneself.

What is the jīva, the individual self?

The jīva is consciousness as it appears limited by ignorance, mind and body: the one who says 'I', acts, enjoys and suffers. In the Bhāmatī it is the seat of ignorance. Its real nature is Brahman, self-luminous and free, and its agency and limits belong to it only because its difference from the mind goes unrecognized.

Who is the Lord, Īśvara, if Brahman is beyond all qualities?

Īśvara is Brahman considered as the creator and ruler of the world. Brahman itself is never ignorant, but in relation to the ignorance of individual selves it acts as their governor, the source from which the world emerges, is sustained and is withdrawn. The Lord is real as Brahman, while the role of ruler belongs to the level of appearance.

What are hearing, reflection and contemplation?

They are the three stages by which the Upanishads' teaching becomes one's own. Hearing, śravaṇa, is learning what the texts say; reflection, manana, removes doubts by reasoning; contemplation, nididhyāsana, is sustained meditation on the truth. Of the three, Vācaspati gives contemplation the leading part on the path to liberation.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Whose Ignorance?

If Brahman is all there is, the error that shows us a world of many things must belong to someone. Vācaspati asks who that is, and how ignorance can exist at all without making Brahman ignorant.

Ignorance, Vācaspati answers, belongs to the individual self, the jīva, and has Brahman only as its object: Brahman is never ignorant and rules ignorance as the Lord. The obvious objection is a circle, since the individual self is itself produced by ignorance. He answers that the two are beginningless, like seed and sprout, each preceding the other without either being first. Ignorance can be called neither real nor unreal, and the self that persists from childhood to old age is what it veils.

  • ignorance
  • individual self
  • self
  • brahman
  • nonduality
  • appearance and reality
  • consciousness
  • identity
  • memory
  • embodiment
  • agency
  • causation
  • creation
  • cosmology
  • metaphysics
  • momentariness

From Hearing to Seeing

The Upanishads say the self is Brahman, and a person can hear that sentence and stay exactly as they were. Vācaspati asks what must happen between hearing the truth and seeing it.

Hearing the Upanishad's teaching gives knowledge, but indirect knowledge; only long contemplation, practised by a mind made calm and detached, turns it into direct realization. Rites and gifts have a real but limited place: they do not produce knowledge of Brahman or liberation, but they purify and awaken the wish to know. Contemplation needs no sacred place, only a spot where the mind can settle. Once Brahman is known, no ritual duty binds, though ordinary action may go on without attachment.

  • meditation
  • self-knowledge
  • knowledge
  • liberation
  • scriptural interpretation
  • scriptural authority
  • hermeneutics
  • sentence meaning
  • ritual
  • ritual action
  • injunction
  • karma
  • mind
  • cognition
  • epistemology
  • action

Within this work

passages held
1,425
distinct concepts
741
by passages held, corpus-wide
#44

What this book thinks together

The wheel takes this book’s leading concepts and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more of its passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “brahman” and “scriptural interpretation”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 28 pairings. 76 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
brahmanscriptural interpretation139
meditationscriptural interpretation63
brahmanself59
scriptural interpretationself58
ignoranceliberation56
liberationscriptural interpretation53
liberationself52
consciousnessself48
ignoranceself45
brahmanliberation44
causationscriptural interpretation42
brahmanmeditation41
brahmanignorance34
brahmancausation32
causationconsciousness27
causationself22
consciousnessscriptural interpretation21
brahmanconsciousness20
causationliberation20
liberationmeditation16
consciousnessliberation14
ignorancescriptural interpretation14
causationignorance12
consciousnessignorance12
meditationself11
ignorancemeditation7
causationmeditation4
consciousnessmeditation3

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. Bhāmatī you are here SA
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works