An Inventory of a Person
If everything a person is can be listed, factor by factor, is anything left over that deserves to be called a self? The manual answers by listing and finding none.
Vasubandhu works through the five aggregates, the heaps of form, feeling, perception, formations and consciousness, one question at a time. An aggregate, he explains, is a heap: like things of past, present and future gathered under one name. Among the formations he lists the mental factors one by one, envy, stinginess and deceit with the rest, and among consciousnesses he adds a storehouse holding the seeds of all formations. What the list never contains is a self; self-view itself appears in it as one more afflicted factor, the habit of taking the heaps as 'I' and 'mine'.
- aggregates
- elements
- sense bases
- consciousness
- perception
- mental factors
- afflictions
- material form
- attention
- self-view
- self-grasping
- storehouse consciousness
- cessation
- buddhist metaphysics
- impermanence
Enter a dialogue
- Each entry in your manual asks what something is, form or feeling, and answers in one definition. What is gained by taking a person apart like this?
- Self-view, in your manual, is taking the five heaps as "I" and "mine". If nothing in the inventory is a self, where does that view come from?
- Your list of the mind's lesser afflictions names envy, stinginess, deceit and dishonesty one by one. What does naming them so exactly do for someone who has them?
- An aggregate is literally a heap, like things from every time gathered under one name. Why describe a person as five heaps rather than one thing?
- Birth, ageing and even names appear in your list as neither matter nor mind, only labels laid on them. Why count labels among what exists?