If Mind Is Buddha, Why Practise?
Every objection in the book is a version of one thought: if the mind already is Buddha, effort is beside the point. Whether seeing that the goal is already here ends practice, or is exactly why it begins, is the question Yanshou answers a hundred ways.
The opponent is the practitioner who sits in emptiness and calls it true cultivation, and Yanshou lets him speak well: good is not liberation either, the true body is already clear, why not just drift free with no-mind? The answers turn the premise round. It is because mind is Buddha that one practises, since iron with no gold in it never yields gold however long it is forged. A jewel can be clear by nature and still need its ore scraped away. Principle and practice are neither one nor two.
- spiritual practice
- practice
- meditation
- emptiness
- nonduality
- buddhahood
- buddha-nature
- awakening
- skillful means
Enter a dialogue
- If the mind already is Buddha, you answer, that is exactly why one practises. How does a goal already reached become a reason to work?
- Iron with no gold in it never becomes gold however long it is forged. What does that smithy image say about people who never practise?
- Your objector says good deeds are as far from liberation as bad ones, since both are thoughts. Why insist on choosing the good?
- Someone has meditated for years and nothing has changed. What would you look for in how they have been practising?
- If persons and things are empty and no one is really acting, who is it that does all these good deeds?