A Oneness That Holds the Many
Must a nondualist call the dualist simply wrong? The commentary answers that a consciousness truly free can show itself as separate souls as easily as it shows itself as one.
The Śaiva Siddhānta kept souls and Shiva apart for ever; other monists made the one alone real and difference a mistake. Abhinavagupta takes a third road. Absolute consciousness is free, and its freedom includes the power to appear divided, so the dualist's many souls and the monist's single reality are both its own self-presentations. Willing, knowing and acting are one power in it, resting in bliss. Real certainty, he argues, comes only after grasping the dualist's case as fully as possible and then breaking through it.
- nondualism
- nonduality
- consciousness
- manifestation
- divine power
- agency
- creation
- self
- self-awareness
- bliss
- metaphysics
- causation
- liberation
Enter a dialogue
- The dualists keep the soul and Shiva apart for ever, yet you do not simply call them wrong. How can a nondualist make room for them?
- If a free consciousness can appear as many separate souls, what stops the dualist from replying that the many are simply real?
- Real certainty, you say, comes only after grasping the opponent's view as fully as possible. Why must a nondualist first learn to think like a dualist?
- Someone feels cut off from everyone around them. If that separateness is one consciousness presenting itself, is the feeling false or true?
- Poison can be turned against poison, these verses suggest. How can the very things that bind a person become the means of setting them free?