WorkAbhinavagupta

Mālinīślokavārttika

Over a thousand verses of commentary that barely leave their scripture's opening line, written to prove that scripture's authority.

by Abhinavagupta187 passages held

  • Sanskrit, the original language
Original language
Sanskrit

Report a rights issue

Overview

Two kinds of Śaivism shared tenth-century Kashmir and read the same revealed scriptures in opposite ways. The Śaiva Siddhānta, the dualist school of the orthodox, kept the soul and Shiva distinct for ever; the Trika and its allied lineages taught that there is only one consciousness. Abhinavagupta wrote this work, a vārttika or commentary in verse, on the Mālinīvijayottara, the scripture he took to be the heart of the Trika and the essence of all Śaiva revelation. Its closing verse says he composed it in Pravarapura, the old name of Kashmir's capital, as a commentary on the scripture's first sentence, and it never goes much further. What the opening needed, in his reading, was a defence of the scripture itself. He argues for what Alexis Sanderson, the Oxford Indologist, calls a supreme nondualism: an absolute consciousness free enough to show itself as many things and as one, so that the dualist's world of distinct souls and the monist's single reality are both its own self-presentations. On that reading the Trika does not refute the Siddhānta so much as contain it. The verses work through how anything can be known, by perception, by inference and by the testimony of scripture, and the closing lines say he had argued all this to establish the authority of his own tradition's revelation. It is the earlier of his two great Trika books; the Tantrāloka, composed later, builds the same scripture into a complete system. The Sanskrit was printed at Srinagar in 1921, and in 1998 the German Indologist Jürgen Hanneder published an edition and English translation of its first 399 verses as Abhinavagupta's Philosophy of Revelation.

Key concepts

What is 'supreme nondualism' in the Mālinīślokavārttika?

It is a nondualism that does not set itself against duality. Ordinary nondualism says only the one is real and difference is an error; the supreme kind says the one consciousness is free enough to appear both as one and as many, so difference is its own display rather than a mistake. On this view the dualist sees something real, just not the whole of it.

What does 'freedom' mean when applied to consciousness?

Freedom, svātantrya, is consciousness's power to show itself however it wills, as a knower, as ways of knowing, as objects and a whole world, with nothing outside it causing this. It is not freedom from a world but the freedom that makes one. The commentary argues that if the light by which things appear stood apart from the knower, nothing would ever appear, so nothing can be posited outside that free awareness.

What are the 'means of knowledge' the commentary examines?

They are the recognised ways of arriving at a true belief: perception through the senses, inference from a sign to what it signals (smoke to fire), and the testimony of a reliable word. Indian philosophers argued over how many there are and which can prove what. The commentary tests each against the question of revelation, and finds that all of them already depend on awareness making itself known.

What did the dualist Śaiva Siddhānta teach?

It taught that the soul and Shiva are distinct for ever, and that bondage is made of real impurity, past action and māyā, the power that limits. The commentary does not dismiss it. Dualistic thought, it says, keeps sprouting from māyā like a tree from its seed and grows back unless liberating knowledge burns it again and again, so the dualist's case must be stated at full strength before it can be cut down.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

A Oneness That Holds the Many

Must a nondualist call the dualist simply wrong? The commentary answers that a consciousness truly free can show itself as separate souls as easily as it shows itself as one.

The Śaiva Siddhānta kept souls and Shiva apart for ever; other monists made the one alone real and difference a mistake. Abhinavagupta takes a third road. Absolute consciousness is free, and its freedom includes the power to appear divided, so the dualist's many souls and the monist's single reality are both its own self-presentations. Willing, knowing and acting are one power in it, resting in bliss. Real certainty, he argues, comes only after grasping the dualist's case as fully as possible and then breaking through it.

  • nondualism
  • nonduality
  • consciousness
  • manifestation
  • divine power
  • agency
  • creation
  • self
  • self-awareness
  • bliss
  • metaphysics
  • causation
  • liberation

Why Trust a Revelation

How could anyone know that a scripture is true, when what it speaks of lies beyond the senses? Over a thousand verses spent on one opening sentence build the answer from the ground of knowing itself.

Abhinavagupta works through the ways of knowing one by one: perception, inference and the testimony of words. Each, he argues, already rests on awareness that shows itself; no one doubts the sun's light once the sun is there. Scripture's meaning is not made of audible sounds but rooted in that awareness, so consciousness grasping itself clearly already has the character of revelation, and the written text is its later, outward form. The closing lines say all this was argued to establish his own tradition's scripture.

  • epistemology
  • perception
  • knowledge
  • scripture
  • language
  • cognition
  • philosophy of mind
  • time
  • causality

Within this work

passages held
187
distinct concepts
216
by passages held, corpus-wide
#367

What this book thinks together

The wheel takes this book’s leading concepts and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more of its passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “consciousness” and “nondualism”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 26 pairings. 81 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
consciousnessnondualism27
consciousnessmanifestation23
consciousnessperception21
consciousnessnonduality13
consciousnessepistemology11
epistemologyperception11
nondualismperception10
consciousnessliberation8
epistemologynondualism8
consciousnessscripture6
manifestationnondualism5
manifestationscripture5
liberationnondualism4
manifestationnonduality4
nondualismscripture4
epistemologyscripture3
liberationnonduality3
liberationscripture3
manifestationperception3
epistemologynonduality2
liberationperception2
nondualityperception2
nondualityscripture2
epistemologymanifestation1
liberationmanifestation1
perceptionscripture1

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vimarśinī

    Commentary on a book by his teacher's teacher, Utpaladeva, whose verses it carries; the shorter of his two works on that treatise, and the one later scholars in Kashmir and Tamil Nadu chose to explain.

    SA
  2. Mālinīślokavārttika you are here SA
  3. Paramārthasāra

    His teaching in its most compact form: a poem of about a hundred verses, with an eleventh-century commentary by Yogarāja.

    SA
  4. Parātrīśikā-vivaraṇa (Parātriṃśikāvivaraṇa)

    On Sanderson's dating it falls between his two great Trika works. It is the longer of his two commentaries on the Parātrīśikā, and the one where his philosophy of language is worked out in full.

    SA
  5. Paryantapañcāśikā

    Among the minor works ascribed to him: a verse primer of the whole system, unprinted until 1951 and still known from a single manuscript.

    SA
  6. Tantrāloka

    Abhinavagupta's largest work and the fullest statement of the Trika, composed after the Mālinīślokavārttika; he later condensed it into the Tantrasāra, and Jayaratha's twelfth-century commentary became the way it was read.

    SA
  7. Tantrasāra

    Abhinavagupta's middle-length statement of the Trika: the Tantrāloka set out again by its author in plain prose, and digested further in two still shorter works.

    SA
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works