Four Ways to One Recognition
If the self is already the one consciousness, why does anyone need a path at all? People differ in how much of their own nature they can grasp at once, the book answers, so the way has to fit the person.
Abhinavagupta orders every discipline of the Śaiva scriptures into four means. The highest is no means at all: the teaching is given once, and the rare listener simply sees. Below it come the way of pure will, the way of knowledge, which refines a person's thinking until it matches what is real, and the way of effort, with breath, meditation and rite. None is wrong; each prepares for the one above, and all end in the same recognition. The Mālinīvijayottara, scripture of his own Trika school, ranks them.
- consciousness
- liberation
- nonduality
- nondualism
- knowledge
- spiritual knowledge
- meditation
- yoga
- spiritual practice
- scriptural authority
- epistemology
- perception
Enter a dialogue
- You sort every discipline of the Śaiva scriptures into four ways, and the highest is no way at all. What does someone on that highest way actually do?
- If every rite and every yoga only uncovers a consciousness that was ours all along, why does this book give the rites so many chapters?
- Someone practises breathing and meditation for years and feels nothing change. Is that bodily practice, the lowest of your four ways, a dead end or a beginning?
- Your way of will needs no rite and no long reasoning, only one inward turn. What happens in a person at that moment?
- Two people hear the same teaching once. One is changed on the spot, the other needs years. Does the difference lie in them or in the teaching?