How to Teach the Self
How do you bring someone to know what they already are, when every answer they give names something else? The prose part is a teacher's manual for exactly that lesson.
Śaṅkara first sets the terms: the teacher must be learned in scripture, calm and compassionate, and the pupil must have given up worldly aims and become a wandering renouncer. Then he stages a lesson. Asked who he is, the pupil answers with his birth, his family and his station in life. The teacher points out that the body he has described will decay into earth, and that a body can no more carry anyone past death than ashes left on the near bank can cross the river.
- teacher-student relationship
- self-knowledge
- scriptural authority
- scripture
- body
- social identity
- identity
- renunciation
- desire
- language
- embodiment
Enter a dialogue
- Asked who he is, your pupil gives his birth, his family and his station in life. Why does the lesson begin by letting him answer wrongly?
- Ashes left on the near bank cannot cross a river, your teacher tells the pupil, and a body cannot carry anyone past death. What does cross, then?
- Your manual teaches only a pupil who has given up worldly aims and become a wandering renouncer. Is knowing the self then closed to anyone with a household?
- A good teacher, your manual says, is learned, calm and compassionate. Why does knowing the self need a teacher at all, if the self is the pupil's own?