The City and Common Life
What turns households and villages into a city, and what does a city exist to secure? Aristotle’s answer determines whether political association serves mere survival or the good life.
Aristotle builds the city from households and villages, then gives political association a purpose beyond protection or trade: it enables human beings to live well. Against the idea that the city is merely an artificial contract, he treats shared life as a development of human capacities, while still defending hierarchies that include natural slavery and distinct virtues for wives and men. Book II tests Plato’s attempt to erase private attachments. Common ownership would multiply quarrels; common families would thin affection. Association needs particular bonds.
- community
- social organization
- political legitimacy
- governance
- political participation
- happiness
- law
Enter a dialogue
- When a household treats one person as a tool, how does your account distinguish political rule from profitable coercion?
- If the city grows from households, why should your account make its common good outrank their private goods?
- What would a person have to surrender before common property could create friendship rather than quarrels?
- How can affection remain political when, as your critique of Plato warns, wives and children become common?