God, or Nature — one substance
Is God a maker standing outside the world, or is the world itself the only thing that could exist? Everything downstream — mind, body, freedom — turns on the answer.
Only one infinite substance exists, and God and Nature are two names for it; particular things are its modes, not separate creations. Against Descartes's split between an outside creator and inert matter, and against the theologians' personal God, Spinoza proves each step from a handful of definitions in Euclid's order. Mind and body become two aspects of one thing rather than two substances, and nothing that happens could have been otherwise — necessity, not choice, runs through the whole of it.
- causality
- metaphysics
- substance
- essence
- necessity
- ontology
- existence
- eternity
- nature
- mind-body
- mind
- perfection
Enter a dialogue
- Descartes split mind and body into two separate things. You say they are one thing seen in two ways. What does that change for someone in pain?
- Sleepwalkers do things they would not dare awake, and no one knows what a body can do. Does that undercut the mind's rule over the body?
- When a stone falls from a roof and kills a man, people keep asking why, until they answer it was God's will. What are they really admitting?
- Calling nature well ordered, you hold, only means it is easy for us to picture. Is the order we admire in the world only in our imagination?