WorkBodhidharma

Treatise on No-Mind

A short dialogue from the Dunhuang caves on having no mind, which tradition ascribes to Bodhidharma and modern scholars doubt he wrote.

by Bodhidharma4 passages held

  • Chinese, the original language
Original title
無心論
Original language
Chinese

Report a rights issue

Overview

When D. T. Suzuki, the Japanese writer who was bringing Zen to Western readers, published his Essays in Zen Buddhism in 1927, an anonymous reviewer in the Times Literary Supplement faulted him for ignoring the Chan manuscripts recently recovered from the sealed cave library at Dunhuang. The reviewer was Arthur Waley, though Suzuki believed it was the Chinese scholar Hu Shih. Spurred by the criticism, Suzuki turned to the Dunhuang texts, and this dialogue, copied into a small notebook now in London, was probably the first of those texts he put into English. Tradition ascribes it to Bodhidharma, as the manuscript's first line does, and modern scholars doubt that he wrote it. Yabuki Keiki, the pioneer of Dunhuang Chan studies who first published photographs of the notebook, ruled him out in 1933 on its quotations and style, and Sekiguchi Shindai argued in 1952 that it came from the same hand as the writings of Niutou Farong, founder of the Oxhead line of Chan. Its opening admits its device: the highest truth has no words, so two speakers are set up to discuss no-mind. A disciple asks whether the teacher has a mind, is told he has none, and objects that someone must still be doing the seeing and hearing. The answer is that seeing and hearing are themselves no-mind; there is no no-mind apart from them, and it is not the mindlessness of wood or stone but the true mind. The disciple presses on through sin, merit and rebirth until he suddenly awakens and bows. Suzuki went on to make wuxin, no-mind, the core of his account of Zen, and in lectures published in 1939 he named it among the things that set Eastern thought apart from Western. Urs App published the first complete English translation in 1995.

Key concepts

What does no-mind mean in this treatise?

No-mind, wuxin, means having no deluded, grasping mind, not having no experience. The treatise defines it in one line: no-mind is the absence of a mind of false appearances. Seeing, hearing and knowing go on; what drops away is the sense of a separate someone holding on to them. That is why the text can say that no-mind is the true mind.

What does "unobtainable" mean here?

Unobtainable is the treatise's word for what cannot be grasped as a thing. Quoting a sutra, the teacher says that once no-mind is known, sin and merit, birth and death, even nirvana, are all unobtainable, and the unobtainable itself is unobtainable too. The point is not that nothing exists but that nothing in experience can be seized and held as a fixed object.

What are the six paths of rebirth?

Buddhism counts six realms in which beings are reborn according to their actions: gods, demigods, humans, animals, hungry ghosts and hells. Circling through them without end is samsara, the round of birth and death. The treatise takes the round for granted and asks what keeps it turning; its answer lies in the mind beings add to experience, and so the way out is a change of seeing, not a change of place.

What is the "supreme" the disciple asks about at the end?

The supreme, taishang, is the treatise's name for the highest point of the way. The teacher measures it by elimination: the heavens are not it, since their long life runs out; bodhisattvas who have escaped birth and death are not it while they still hold on to being and non-being or even to the middle way between them. Only when all three are forgotten is the supreme reached.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Having No Mind

A teacher says he has no mind, and his disciple asks who, then, is doing the seeing and hearing. Whether a person can be without a mind and still be fully awake, and not a block of wood, is the whole argument.

The dialogue admits its device at the start: the highest truth has no words, so two speakers are set up to talk about no-mind. No-mind turns out not to be the absence of experience but the absence of a grasping mind behind it: seeing and hearing are themselves no-mind. Against the charge that this makes a person like wood or stone, the teacher points to the heavenly drum, which sounds of itself without intending to. Delusion is a rope taken for a snake in the dark; awakening is the sun coming up.

  • no-mind
  • nonduality
  • karma
  • wisdom
  • emptiness
  • consciousness
  • ultimate reality
  • awareness
  • conventional truth
  • perception
  • practice
  • rebirth

Within this work

passages held
4
distinct concepts
15
by passages held, corpus-wide
#837

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. Treatise on No-Mind (無心論) you are here ZH
  2. 少室六門

    A later anthology built around the one text that may preserve his teaching, the "Two Entrances"; tradition ascribes all six of its treatises to Bodhidharma, and modern scholars doubt the other five are his.

    ZH
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works