Having No Mind
A teacher says he has no mind, and his disciple asks who, then, is doing the seeing and hearing. Whether a person can be without a mind and still be fully awake, and not a block of wood, is the whole argument.
The dialogue admits its device at the start: the highest truth has no words, so two speakers are set up to talk about no-mind. No-mind turns out not to be the absence of experience but the absence of a grasping mind behind it: seeing and hearing are themselves no-mind. Against the charge that this makes a person like wood or stone, the teacher points to the heavenly drum, which sounds of itself without intending to. Delusion is a rope taken for a snake in the dark; awakening is the sun coming up.
- no-mind
- nonduality
- karma
- wisdom
- emptiness
- consciousness
- ultimate reality
- awareness
- conventional truth
- perception
- practice
- rebirth
Enter a dialogue
- The teacher in this dialogue says he has no mind, and his disciple asks who, then, is seeing and hearing. How does the teacher answer?
- Wood and stone have no mind either, the disciple objects. Why is a person without a mind not just a block of wood?
- The teacher here compares no-mind to the heavenly drum, which sounds of itself without meaning to. What kind of action is that picture of?
- In the dark, someone sees a tree stump as a ghost and a rope as a snake, and is terrified. What does the dialogue say ends that fear?
- If everywhere there is only no-mind, the disciple asks, there should be no sin and no merit. Why, then, do beings keep being reborn?