PhilosopherUnited States

Charles Sanders Peirce

Pragmatism's founder, and eighty thousand unpublished pages

17 works · 445 passages grounded

Lifespan
1839–1914
School
Pragmatism
Also known as
C. S. Peirce
Wikipedia

The mind

For thirty-two years the founder of American pragmatism drew a government salary for measuring the earth. From 1859 until the last day of 1891 the United States Coast Survey employed Charles Sanders Peirce in geodesy and gravimetry, swinging pendulums in America and Europe to map small local variations in gravity. In 1879 he made the first attempt to measure the metre against a wavelength of light — the method by which the metre would be defined from 1960 to 1983. The one full-length book he saw into print was a monograph on the brightness of stars, published at Leipzig in 1878. The philosophy went into magazines.

Benjamin Peirce, his father, held Harvard's chair in mathematics for nearly fifty years and directed the Coast Survey himself from 1867 to 1874. He taught his son by setting him problems and checking his solutions instead of supplying them. In 1863 the Lawrence Scientific School gave Charles the first summa cum laude in chemistry it had awarded. So he came to philosophy from a laboratory bench, at a moment when the lively alternative in American thought was at Concord, where Ralph Waldo Emerson and his circle were circulating ideas taken from the German idealist Schelling. Cambridge, Peirce remarked in 1892, had kept a good supply of antiseptics against Concord. The trouble, for a man who measured things, was that philosophy settled its questions by what was agreeable to reason — a pendulum swinging between material and spiritual views without ever stopping.

What the bench taught him came out in six articles for Popular Science Monthly between November 1877 and August 1878. Stop asking what makes a belief true, the first of them proposes, and ask what makes one stick. Doubt is an irritation and belief a habit; inquiry is the struggle from doubt into belief, and it ends when the irritation ends, true or not. The second article turns that into a rule for meaning: whatever effects an object could conceivably have on practice, your idea of those effects is the whole of your idea of the object. Truth, on the same rule, is the opinion investigation is fated to settle on, and the real is whatever that opinion is about. That definition puts a community inside the notion of reality, and it makes being wrong the ordinary condition of inquiry rather than a failure of it.

Johns Hopkins made him lecturer in logic in 1879, the only academic post he ever held. In 1883 he edited Studies in Logic by Members of the Johns Hopkins University, a volume of his students' work and his own. That same year, on his biographer Joseph Brent's account, Simon Newcomb — an astronomer his father had taught — told a Hopkins trustee that Peirce had lived and travelled with a woman he was not married to. Peirce had married Juliette Froissy days after his divorce from Harriet Melusina Fay became final. The university dismissed him in January 1884, and he never held a teaching post again. Charles William Eliot, who had taught him at Harvard, was president there from 1869 to 1909; proposals to employ Peirce came up repeatedly, and Eliot vetoed them. In 1902 Peirce asked the new Carnegie Institution for money to write the systematic book he had never managed. Newcomb sat on its executive committee, and its president, Daniel Coit Gilman, had run Johns Hopkins when Peirce was dismissed. The grant went elsewhere.

In 1887 he spent part of his inheritance on two thousand acres near Milford, Pennsylvania, and had an 1854 farmhouse remodelled to his design. Arisbe, the Peirces called it. The evolutionary cosmology belongs to those years — five articles for The Monist, arguing that absolute chance is real and that the laws of nature are habits the universe fell into. The poverty belongs to them too: he could not heat the house in winter, wrote on the backs of old manuscripts because he could not buy paper, and depended on his brother and his neighbours to settle his debts. His old friend William James, by then the most famous philosopher in America, arranged paid lecture series for him near Harvard in 1898 and 1903. James wrote to his Boston friends each year from 1907 until his own death in 1910, raising a subscription for Peirce.

It was James who put the word into print. At Berkeley on 26 August 1898 he told an audience that a principle he had heard Peirce state in Cambridge in the early 1870s deserved a name: he called it pragmatism, credited the coinage to Peirce, and sent his listeners to the article of 1878. Peirce disliked what the pragmatists built with it enough that in April 1905 he renamed his own version pragmaticism. He died at Milford in 1914, leaving roughly 1,650 manuscripts — eighty thousand pages at the lowest estimate — which Juliette passed to Harvard's philosophy department. The first volumes of his Collected Papers appeared in 1931. Readers who arrived that way found a notation for quantifiers worked out in 1885, independently of the German logician Gottlob Frege; the sorting of signs into likenesses, indices and symbols on which modern semiotics is built; and the argument that guessing at an explanation, which he called retroduction, is a form of inference with rules of its own. The chronological edition of his writings, begun in 1982, is not finished.

Key concepts

When Peirce says a belief is true, what exactly is he saying?

That it is the opinion investigation is fated to end in — and the real is whatever that opinion is about. Truth is not a match between a mind and a thing; it is where evidence carries inquiry when inquiry is pushed far enough. He reached the formulation by turning his 1878 rule for clarity onto the word "true", and most of the rest hangs from it.

Is his constant hedging about certainty a doctrine, or just temperament?

A doctrine, and it has a name: fallibilism. No measurement has ever shown exact conformity to a law; no premiss in philosophy is strong enough to carry an argument by itself; and the only method he ranks above tenacity, authority and the a priori method is the one that can be applied badly and so corrected. The hedging is a claim about inquiry, not modesty about himself.

When he says a conception is its 'practical' effects, does practical mean useful?

No. Practical here means bearing on conduct and expectation — what you would look for, and what you would do, including in cases that never arise. Usefulness and profit do not enter anywhere. The rule tells you what a conception amounts to; it is not a theory of what it pays to believe, and at that difference Peirce parts from William James.

He calls a word a 'symbol'. What is he claiming by that?

That it signifies only because there is a settled habit of taking it so. In the division he made in 1867, a likeness signifies by resembling its object and an index by standing in some real connection with it; a symbol has neither, and works entirely through being interpreted. Meaning, on this account, lives in habits of interpretation rather than in any picture before the mind.

Do his terms keep the same meaning across forty years of papers?

Often not, and the papers here run from 1867 to 1908. The third kind of inference is "hypothesis" in 1878 and "retroduction" in the late work; "pragmatism" became "pragmaticism" in 1905; "induction" is used loosely in one 1878 paper for synthetic reasoning in general. In 1892 he said nominalism had blinkered him in the 1860s. Always ask which paper a term comes from.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

Making a Muddled Idea Clear

Two centuries of logicians had sorted ideas into clear and distinct; Peirce asks what a conception amounts to when neither label settles anything, and offers a rule for deciding which disputes are worth having at all.

Consider what practical effects the object of a conception could conceivably have: that inventory is the whole of the conception, and a question no conceivable difference could settle is not a question. The rule was aimed at metaphysical rubbish rather than at truth, and when James and the Oxford pragmatists turned it into a doctrine about what it pays to believe, Peirce renamed his own version pragmaticism — ugly enough, he hoped, to be safe from kidnappers. He had stated it to a Cambridge club thirty years earlier.

  • pragmatism
  • meaning
  • conceptual clarity
  • clarity
  • action
  • conduct
  • thought
  • counterfactuals
  • metaphysics

Doubt, Belief, and the Community of Inquirers

What settles a belief is not the same question as what makes one true, and once the two come apart, truth has to be located somewhere other than in any individual mind's certainty.

Doubt is an irritation and belief a habit, so inquiry ends whenever the irritation ends, true or not — which is the charge against tenacity, authority and whatever is agreeable to reason. Against Descartes, no lone mind can manufacture a doubt or certify a result; the real is what a community of investigators is fated to agree on, and being wrong becomes the ordinary condition of the work rather than a failure of it. Fallibilism follows: a method is worth something only if it can be applied wrongly, and so corrected.

  • inquiry
  • doubt
  • belief
  • truth
  • reality
  • fallibilism
  • epistemology
  • certainty
  • knowledge
  • scientific method
  • social epistemology
  • community
  • authority
  • tenacity
  • objectivity

Guessing, and the Logic of Science

Where does a new idea enter reasoning at all? Deduction only unpacks its premisses and induction only counts, so the moment a hypothesis first occurs to anyone is either outside logic altogether or a third kind of inference with rules of its own.

Retroduction, as Peirce came to call it, is the one inference that adds anything, and it can be done well or badly: economy of research, testability, and a guessing instinct he thought animals share all govern which conjecture is worth trying. The three forms then divide the labour — hypothesis proposes, deduction draws out consequences, induction tests. He denied throughout that any calculus could rate an induction's probability, since what matters is how often arguments of that form come true in this world, not across all possible ones.

  • abduction
  • hypothesis
  • deduction
  • induction
  • inference
  • probability
  • syllogism
  • explanation
  • evidence
  • scientific reasoning
  • inductive logic
  • statistical inference
  • instinct
  • methodology
  • logic

All Thought Is in Signs

Nothing in the mind is self-evident and nothing means anything on its own, so what must be added before one thing can stand for another — and what is left of the thinker once it has been?

Every sign requires a third term to interpret it, and because each thought is itself a sign awaiting interpretation by a later one, no first cognition can be reached and no intuition underwrites anything. Out of that argument came the sorting of signs into likenesses, indices and symbols on which modern semiotics was built, and the three categories it rests on — quality, relation, representation. The self comes with it — a man developing under the laws of inference, not something standing apart from them.

  • semiotics
  • signs
  • symbols
  • indices
  • representation
  • categories
  • thirdness
  • denotation
  • cognition
  • intuition
  • introspection
  • self-consciousness
  • infinite regress
  • language
  • predication

Chance, Habit, and a Universe That Grew

If every law of nature held exactly and always, growth, diversity and feeling would have no explanation and nothing in the world could ever be new. Peirce took that cost seriously enough to give the laws a history.

Absolute chance is real, continuity is the master key, and the regularities of nature are habits the universe fell into and is still acquiring — which makes matter mind grown hidebound with habit rather than the reverse. The necessitarians, he argued, had produced no evidence whatever: no measurement has ever shown exact conformity to a formula, and a postulate is what a man offers when he has no security to give. Beside development by chance and development by necessity he sets a third, in which a mind is drawn toward an idea before it possesses it.

  • chance
  • tychism
  • synechism
  • continuity
  • habit
  • evolution
  • necessitarianism
  • determinism
  • indeterminism
  • spontaneity
  • laws of nature
  • natural law
  • cosmology
  • agapism
  • emergence
  • panpsychism
  • idealism
  • philosophy of mind

A Religion No Proof Can Establish

Can a man who measures things for a living say anything about God without faking a demonstration or leaving his logic at the door? The answer throws out the argument from design and keeps the belief.

Order cannot be quantified, so design has nothing to stand on: any collection whatever yields some regularity to a searcher who goes looking afterwards. What replaces it is continuous with the rest of him — belief arriving unbidden out of aimless play of thought, then treated as a hypothesis whose only test is what it does to a life. Creeds fare worst in this account, since a perception hardens into trust, trust into belief, and belief into an abstraction theologians quarrel over; the earliest Christian teaching asked assent to none.

  • theology
  • religion
  • philosophy of religion
  • natural theology
  • design
  • musement
  • faith
  • religious faith
  • christianity
  • church
  • doctrinal authority
  • love
  • uniformity of nature
  • cosmic order
  • religious experience
  • anti-sectarianism
  • science and religion

By the numbers

works held
17
passages traced
445
concepts traced
644
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “induction” and “probability”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 21 pairings. 87 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
inductionprobability24
epistemologyinduction22
epistemologyprobability14
inductionlogic14
logicprobability14
logicmetaphysics9
epistemologylogic7
chancelogic5
continuitylogic4
continuitymetaphysics4
continuityphilosophy of mind4
chancemetaphysics3
chanceprobability3
chancecontinuity2
chanceepistemology2
chancephilosophy of mind2
continuityepistemology2
epistemologyphilosophy of mind2
chanceinduction1
continuityprobability1
logicphilosophy of mind1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: probability in The Probability of Induction, 80.8%.

Density 0% 80.8%

Concept density per work, chronological 17 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 101 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearlogicinductionepistemologyprobabilitymetaphysicscontinuitychancephilosophy of mind
On a New List of Categories37.5%6.3%6.3%0%0%0%0%0%
Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed for Man8%4%40%0%0%4%0%4%
Some Consequences of Four Incapacities17.4%13%4.3%2.2%6.5%2.2%0%19.6%
The Fixation of Belief30.8%7.7%23.1%3.8%11.5%0%0%0%
Deduction, Induction, and Hypothesis30.4%73.9%4.3%17.4%0%0%0%0%
How to Make Our Ideas Clear21.9%0%6.3%0%9.4%0%0%3.1%
The Doctrine of Chances55%5%10%75%0%10%5%0%
The Order of Nature33.3%33.3%33.3%18.5%22.2%0%22.2%11.1%
The Probability of Induction0%61.5%38.5%80.8%0%0%3.8%0%
The Architecture of Theories4.8%0%4.8%4.8%9.5%9.5%9.5%19%
Man's Glassy Essence0%0%0%0%0%6.5%3.2%19.4%
The Doctrine of Necessity Examined7.7%19.2%26.9%19.2%0%0%34.6%0%
The Law of Mind15.4%5.1%5.1%2.6%0%48.7%2.6%10.3%
Evolutionary Love2.6%2.6%0%5.1%2.6%5.1%10.3%7.7%
What is Christian Faith?0%0%16.7%0%0%0%0%0%
Leibniz Rewritten33.3%0%0%0%55.6%33.3%11.1%0%
A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God18.2%9.1%18.2%3%12.1%0%0%0%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

EARLY PAPERS — CATEGORIES & SIGNS

  1. 1867 On a New List of Categories

    The earliest item on this shelf, and the root of everything after it: the three-part scheme of quality, relation and representation reappears in the logic papers of 1877–78 and again in the evolutionary cosmology of the 1890s.

    EN
  2. 1868 Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed for Man

    Where Peirce clears the ground. The four denials reached here — no intuition, no introspection, no thought without signs, no conception of the incognizable — are restated as premisses at the head of the sequel.

    EN
  3. 1868 Some Consequences of Four Incapacities

    The sequel, and where the argument arrives. The preceding article asked whether we have certain faculties; this one takes its four denials as premisses and follows them out to a theory of reality and of the self.

    EN

THE LOGIC OF SCIENCE — A MAGAZINE SERIES

  1. 1877 The Fixation of Belief

    Written for readers with no philosophy behind them: the first instalment of a six-part course in the logic of science, serialised in a general-interest monthly. Everything the other 1877–78 papers do rests on the account of doubt, belief and inquiry set out here.

    EN
  2. 1878 Deduction, Induction, and Hypothesis

    The paper that ends the series. Its central idea — guessing, treated as an inference with rules of its own rather than as a lack of them — is what Peirce kept working at for the rest of his life.

    EN
  3. 1878 How to Make Our Ideas Clear

    The second instalment of the 1877–78 series, nominally about a dead distinction in the logic textbooks. Two decades after it was printed, the American pragmatists took it as their charter.

    EN
  4. 1878 The Doctrine of Chances

    Third in the series, and the point where the account of inquiry acquires a price. Half of it is arithmetic — card packs, whist hands, insurance offices — and the other half asks whether a creature who never lives to complete a run of trials may reason from probabilities at all.

    EN
  5. 1878 The Order of Nature

    The religious instalment of the 1877–78 series. It reaches forward to the essay Peirce published at the end of his life: both ask what a scientific habit of mind is entitled to say about God, and they give different answers.

    EN
  6. 1878 The Probability of Induction

    A general magazine's readers are asked here to check a table of black and white balls for themselves. It is the most technical stretch of the 1877–78 series, and the one that takes on the probability textbooks directly.

    EN

THE COSMOLOGY YEARS — CHANCE, MIND & LOVE

  1. 1891 The Architecture of Theories

    A prospectus rather than a treatise, and the first of the five articles of Peirce's metaphysical series in Paul Carus's Monist, 1891–93 — the run in which the cosmology it sketches was built.

    EN
  2. 1892 Man's Glassy Essence

    Three things that do not obviously belong together — the constitution of matter, the chemistry of living tissue, and the question whether a church or a crowd can think — joined by the argument that mind and matter differ only in which side you look from.

    EN
  3. 1892 The Doctrine of Necessity Examined

    It stands second in the series, and it is the one that started a quarrel: Carus attacked it twice in his own journal and Peirce defended it once, so that the argument about chance occupied The Monist for fifteen months.

    EN
  4. 1892 The Law of Mind

    Where tychism acquires its partner. The chance of the April paper needed continuity to work in, and continuity gets its name and its defence here — the idea Peirce came to regard as the one his philosophy could least do without.

    EN
  5. 1893 Evolutionary Love

    Here the cosmology turns into an argument about how people ought to live: chance, necessity and love applied to the history of ideas, and to the ethics of a commercial century. It closed the Monist series.

    EN
  6. 1893 What is Christian Faith?

    Addressed past the theologians to two audiences at once — churchmen keeping their membership narrow, and the scientifically educated, shut out of the churches, who were talking about founding one of their own.

    EN

LATE & SCATTERED — A NOTICE AND A LAST ARGUMENT

  1. 1899 Leibniz Rewritten

    The one book review on this shelf, from the years after the Coast Survey when Peirce lived partly by notices and dictionary work. It is the only piece here in which he is weighing someone else's system rather than building his own.

    EN
  2. 1908 A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God

    Thirty years after the logic papers and fifteen after the cosmology, Peirce turns the machinery of hypothesis on the question the 1878 series had left open.

    EN
Begin a dialogue with Charles Sanders Peirce

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.