Get started

WorkCicero

The Academic Questions, Treatise de Finibus, and Tusculan Disputations

Three treatises from a single terrible year, bound as one Victorian volume: what can be known, what is worth wanting, and how to bear what comes.

by Cicero1,122 passages held

  • English, a translation held here, and your language
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work See it in context
Original title
Academica, De finibus bonorum et malorum, Tusculanae Disputationes
First published
45 BCE(aged 61)
Original language
Latin

Report a rights issue

Overview

This is a Victorian collection rather than a book Cicero wrote — three separate treatises put between one pair of covers by Henry Bohn in London in 1853, translated by Charles Duke Yonge, and fitted out with an appendix sketching the Greek philosophers named inside for readers who would not know Carneades from Chrysippus. What holds the three together is a single year. Cicero lost his daughter Tullia in February 45 BCE, and Caesar's victory had already shut him out of public life; he answered both by attempting to carry the whole of Greek philosophy into Latin at speed, inventing the vocabulary as he went. The Academic Questions is where he sets the terms: the sceptical Academy's position that certainty is not available to us, that a reasonable person therefore hears both sides and follows whichever is more probable, and that this is a discipline rather than a shrug. De finibus asks what the ends of good and evil actually are, and puts Epicurean, Stoic and Academic answers against one another in turn. The Tusculan Disputations takes the same method to the things people lie awake over — the fear of death, physical pain, grief, and whether being good is enough to make a life happy. Read in that order, the volume runs from knowledge to ends to endurance: the sequence Cicero thought a Roman ought to be taken through, and the reason a cheap uniform series aimed at readers without Greek printed the three as one book. Of the Academica's six books, one reached us entire and part of a second. What Bohn's subscribers got was the surviving second book of the first version and the opening stretch of a longer later one, set out continuously as though nothing were missing.

Key concepts

Why does Cicero put rival philosophical schools into arguments against one another?

Because the Academic method tests a position by making it face its strongest rival, rather than granting authority to a school in advance. In this volume, Epicurean, Stoic, and Academic speakers expose what each account explains and what it leaves unresolved; the dispute becomes a way to judge claims, not a ceremony of choosing sides. No school gets the last word.

What does Cicero mean by the “end” of good and evil?

The end is the highest good that organizes a life, not the final event at which a life arrives. In De finibus, Cicero makes each school identify this governing aim before it can rank pleasure, virtue, wealth, or bodily security. Once the end is fixed, individual choices acquire their meaning. That is why the argument concerns conduct as much as definition.

Why does Epicurus distinguish pleasure from the absence of pain?

For Epicureanism, pleasure names the good, but the argument does not reduce pleasure to continual indulgence. It treats the absence of bodily pain and mental disturbance as the stable condition in which pleasure can be enjoyed. Cicero presses this view against rival accounts of virtue and ambition, asking whether a life should seek pleasant experience or freedom from disturbance. The distinction changes the target.

What are “indifferent” things in the Stoic account of a good life?

Indifferent things are neither good nor evil in themselves, although Stoics can rank some as preferred. Health, wealth, reputation, and their opposites therefore cannot determine a person's moral worth; virtue alone does that. The claim lets Stoicism explain why a wise person may choose health or political office without treating either as happiness. Circumstances matter, but they do not rule.

Why does Cicero call passions diseases of the soul?

A passion is treated as a disease of the soul when a judgment disorders a person's responses, as grief, fear, or bodily pain can do. The metaphor does not make suffering imaginary; it asks whether reason can correct the belief that gives suffering its tyrannical force. Tusculan Disputations therefore examines emotions as conditions requiring argument and practice, not mere facts to endure. Diagnosis comes before treatment.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Probability without certainty

When certainty cannot be reached, how should judgment proceed, and what separates disciplined inquiry from mere indecision? The answer determines whether doubt can still guide public and private conduct.

Cicero gives the Academic sceptic a demanding rule: hear both sides, suspend certainty, and follow the judgment that appears more probable. In the surviving second book of the first version of the Academica, this method answers dogmatic claims without pretending that evidence disappears. Rhetoric therefore becomes an instrument for testing positions rather than decorating conclusions. Doubt does not excuse inaction; it makes accountability depend on the quality of the reasoning available.

  • truth
  • evidence
  • judgment
  • logic
  • rhetoric
  • language
  • authority

Enter a dialogue

Choosing the good life

What should a person ultimately pursue when pleasure, virtue, and worldly success point in different directions? The stakes reach beyond theory: the chosen end governs every judgment about conduct, character, and happiness.

De finibus stages Epicurean, Stoic, and Academic answers to the ends of good and evil, forcing each school to show what its account makes of virtue and happiness. Cicero does not replace the debate with a private formula; he makes rival principles expose their consequences. Written after Tullia's death in February 45 BCE, the inquiry asks how ethics can direct a life when reputation, power, greed, and loss offer competing measures of its worth.

  • ethics
  • integrity
  • duty
  • justice
  • responsibility
  • reputation
  • law
  • injustice
  • stoicism
  • virtue
  • pleasure
  • epistemology
  • virtue ethics
  • wisdom

Enter a dialogue

Training for pain and death

Can philosophical judgment withstand the fears that ordinary arguments leave untouched, especially death, pain, and grief? The answer tests whether virtue can make a person capable of endurance rather than merely able to describe it.

The Tusculan Disputations carries the argument from choosing an end to facing what the body and mind resist: fear of death, physical pain, and grief. Cicero examines whether being good is enough to make a life happy, opposing the belief that suffering automatically defeats moral agency. Caesar's victory had already excluded him from public life, yet the treatise turns that pressure into philosophical work: endurance must be argued for, not simply praised.

  • death
  • fear
  • suffering
  • dignity
  • responsibility
  • duty
  • happiness
  • skepticism
  • pain

Enter a dialogue

Within this work

passages held
1,122
distinct concepts
1,160
by passages held, corpus-wide
#19

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: accountability with justice.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 20 pairings. 290 shared passages in all. 80 weaker pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
accountabilityjustice30
corruptionjustice23
corruptionpower23
justicepower21
accountabilitytruth20
justicetruth20
integrityjustice19
ethicsjustice16
ethicsintegrity15
ethicspower14
accountabilitycorruption11
corruptionethics11
corruptionintegrity11
accountabilityethics10
accountabilitypower9
integritytruth9
rhetorictruth9
justicerhetoric7
accountabilityintegrity6
integritypower6

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. -70 Orations

    Four volumes of the speeches themselves — some delivered, some, like the case against Verres, only published. The philosophical books that fill the rest of the shelf came later, most of them once he had been shut out of that life.

     LAEN
  2. -54 The Republic (De re publica)

    Plato wrote a Republic and then a Laws; Cicero set out to do both, and the treatise on law is this book's companion — begun a couple of years later and left unfinished.

     LAEN
  3. -52 Treatise on the Laws (De legibus)

    Unfinished, unpublished, and on the available evidence never released at all. For centuries it travelled as the lesser half of a pair whose better half had gone missing.

     LAEN
  4. -46 Brutus or History of Famous Orators (Brutus; Orator)

    Not the speeches but the account of them, made when the courts had stopped sitting. The edition carries Orator with it, the portrait of the ideal speaker written for the same dedicatee in the same year.

     LAEN
  5. -45 The Academic Questions, Treatise de Finibus, and Tusculan Disputations (Academica, De finibus bonorum et malorum, Tusculanae Disputationes) you are here LAEN
  6. -45 Tusculan Disputations, Treatises on the Nature of the Gods, and on the Commonwealth (Tusculanae Disputationes, De natura deorum, De re publica)

    Harper's American gathering of Bohn's cheap English classics: the Tusculan Disputations for a second time, standing at the front of a volume that goes on into theology and politics.

     LAEN
  7. -44 On Friendship (De Amicitia)

    Copyists kept this and On Old Age bound together for so long that printers followed them. The edition prints the Dream of Scipio after it, which belongs to De re publica.

     LAEN
  8. -44 On Moral Duties (De officiis)

    The last of his philosophical books, and the one that travelled furthest: for centuries afterwards it was simply the standard book of conduct.

     LAEN
  9. -44 On Old Age (Cato Maior de Senectute)

    Written alongside On Friendship and sent to the same friend, Atticus; the later book refers back to this one by name.

     LAEN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works