Speech Against Power
Can public speech make authority answerable, or does power decide what counts as truth? The answer places reputation, law, and political survival at risk.
Speech, in these volumes, does more than persuade a court: it tests character, exposes corruption, and makes authority answerable before a public. In 70 BCE, Cicero broke with courtroom expectation by leading with evidence against Verres rather than delivering the opening his side had been promised; Verres fled, and the written speeches made Cicero. Later, the Philippics turned rhetoric against Mark Antony. The Republic paid for that judgment.
- justice
- integrity
- rhetoric
- virtue
- truth
- ethics
- character
- logic
- leadership
- power
- reputation
- authority
- corruption
- judgment
- duty
- responsibility
- legacy
- accountability
- wisdom
- morality
- communication
- dignity
- evidence
- law
- loyalty
- perception
- courage
- influence
- tradition
- political corruption
Enter a dialogue
- A governor had a man crucified as he kept crying 'I am a Roman citizen'. Why is one ignored cry a danger to every citizen?
- Whoever defended a man accused of killing his father had the dictator Sulla's favourite against him, and no advocate dared. Why did you?
- After long silence you rose to thank Caesar for pardoning a man who fought against him. Is thanking a conqueror ever free speech?
- A tribune's land bill offered citizens farms but gave ten commissioners absolute power for five years. Why did you tell the people to refuse a gift?
- You told the senate you had lived long enough, and any extra life belonged to the republic. Was that courage, or a bid for a glorious death?