One Word and a Great Doubt
Asked whether a dog has Buddha-nature, Zhaozhou said no. Why holding that single word with all one's doubt, without reasoning about it, should break a person open is the method Dahui stakes everything on.
Dahui's instruction is narrow on purpose. Take up the word wu, no, and look at it day and night; do not add a comment, do not reason it out, do not grasp it where it is raised or where the mouth opens. The doubt it produces is not a problem to solve but a pressure to be borne until it bursts, and then birth and death are cut through. His own bamboo stick serves the same end: call it a stick and you clash with it, refuse to and you turn your back.
- koan practice
- koans
- direct realization
- conceptual thought
- nonconceptuality
- awakening
- direct experience
Enter a dialogue
- A monk asked whether a dog has Buddha-nature, and Zhaozhou said no. Why tell busy people to hold that one word day and night?
- You forbid students to reason about the word "no" or to explain it. How can a sensible person look at a word without thinking about what it means?
- You hold up a bamboo stick and say that calling it a stick clashes and not calling it a stick turns away. What should the student call it?
- Doubt usually feels like a weakness to be got rid of as fast as possible. Why do you want students to feed it until it bursts?
- If one word from an old story is enough, why do your letters keep explaining, at length, how to hold it?