The Backward Step
If the way is already complete, why practise at all? The manual opens on that objection and answers it with a cushion, a posture and a way of thinking that is not thinking.
Dōgen grants the objection and turns it: the slightest gap opens a distance as wide as heaven and earth, and even the Buddha sat for six years. So stop chasing words and take the backward step that turns the light inward. Then the instructions: a quiet room, a thick mat, legs crossed, ears over shoulders, eyes open. Think of not-thinking; how do you think of not-thinking? Non-thinking. Sitting is not learning meditation but the gate of ease and joy, open to the clever and the slow alike.
- zazen
- practice and realization
- samadhi
- equality
- awakening
- non-doing
- nonduality
- realization
- impermanence
- inward reflection
- spiritual practice
- meditation practice
- non-conceptual thought
Enter a dialogue
- Your manual opens on the objection that a way already complete needs no practice. How does a hair's breadth of error, splitting heaven from earth, answer it?
- Someone keeps reading books about meditation instead of sitting. Why does your manual send them to the backward step that turns the light inward?
- You insist the eyes stay open, the ears line up with the shoulders, the nose with the navel. Why should awakening care how someone holds their head?
- Sitting, you write, is not learning meditation but the gate of ease and joy. What kind of practice is it, if not a skill to be learned?
- Someone plans a long journey to find the right teacher and place to sit. Why does your manual tell them not to leave their own seat?