Practice Is Awakening
Most religious paths treat practice as the road and awakening as the destination. What changes if the sitting is already the arrival, and a beginner's first effort is the whole of realisation, is the claim the essays press from every side.
To think practice and realisation are two, Dōgen writes, is the view of outsiders; in the Buddha's teaching they are one, so even a beginner's practice is the whole of original realisation. Studying the Buddha way is studying the self, studying the self is forgetting the self, and forgetting the self is being confirmed by all things. Awakening is like the moon in water: the moon does not get wet, the water is not broken. He tells his monks simply to sit and let body and mind drop away.
- practice
- realization
- awakening
- buddhist practice
- meditation
- zazen
- embodiment
Enter a dialogue
- Studying the Buddha way is studying the self, you write, and studying the self is forgetting the self. How does study make something disappear?
- If a beginner's first sitting is already the whole of awakening, as you claim, why would anyone keep sitting for forty years?
- In your essay on the realised kōan, awakening is the moon in water, the moon not wet, the water not broken. What does that image guard against?
- Someone recites prayers out loud every day and wonders why nothing changes. Why do you compare endless recitation to frogs croaking in spring fields?
- You tell monks to drop incense, bowing and sutra reading and simply sit, yet your essays are full of rules for robes and washing. Which counts?