The Doubting Layman
May someone who no longer believes everything their church teaches stay in it and join its worship? Yes, the pamphlet answers, provided they do not pass for orthodox.
Sidgwick separates the moral question from the ecclesiastical one: whatever the church ought to reform, what should an individual do while its creeds stand as they are? Nobody, he observes, dreams of seceding from the Church of England because he cannot assent to one statement of the Apostles' Creed, and that common understanding shows what membership means. A layman need take no more part in a service than he wishes. What he may not do is deliberately pass for orthodox, for that links him to every other religious pretence.
- religious conformity
- church membership
- religious membership
- religious dissent
- public worship
- religious belief
- religious community
- religious toleration
- religious pluralism
- conscientious disagreement
Enter a dialogue
- Nobody leaves the Church of England over a single clause of the Apostles' Creed. Why do you take that as proof of what membership really means?
- You liken a heretical Protestant layman who passes for orthodox to an unbelieving priest kneeling before an image of the infant Christ. Is that fair?
- Someone still joins in worship but no longer believes several things the service says. When, on your account, does taking part become hypocrisy?
- A minority in a congregation no longer holds the creeds recited every Sunday. What may they fairly ask of the majority that still does?
- Doubters now voice their doubts openly, and church writers deplore it. Why do you think discouraging that disagreement would harm religion itself?