MysticEngland

Julian of Norwich

The recluse who was promised that all shall be well

2 works · 262 passages grounded

Lifespan
~1343–~1416
Wikipedia

The mind

The Church in fourteenth-century England taught every Christian that sin deserves blame, that it angers God, and that many souls will be condemned to hell without end. Julian of Norwich wrote that she believed all of it, and also that in a series of visions she had looked for anger in God and found none. She would give up neither statement, and spent some twenty years asking how both could be true.

The visions came in May 1373, when she was thirty and a half and so ill that her parish priest was called to her deathbed. He held a cross before her face, and her mother stood at the bedside. Julian saw the figure on the cross bleed, and over the following hours received sixteen showings, as she calls them. Then the pain came back. A man from a religious order came to ask how she was, and she told him she had raved that day. He laughed, but turned serious when she added that the cross had seemed to bleed, and she writes that she was ashamed of having dismissed what she saw.

Little else about her is known, and even her name is uncertain. She lived as an anchoress, a woman enclosed for life in a cell built against a church, at the church of St Julian in Norwich. Julian is usually thought to come from that church, though it was also a woman's name at the time. A will of 1394 that leaves money to Julian the anchoress is the first document to mention her, and three more wills follow, the last in 1416. One of them names a Sarah who lived with her. Margery Kempe, a visionary from the Norfolk port of Lynn, travelled to consult her about her own visions around 1413 and described her as expert in such things. She calls herself unlettered, and she wrote in English.

She wrote the visions down twice. Comfortable Words for Christ's Lovers is the short first account; Revelations of Divine Love, in eighty-six chapters, is what that account became after two decades of thought. To her question about blame she was given only a picture: a servant runs to do his lord's errand, falls into a hollow and lies there hurt, and the lord looks at him with pity. By her own count twenty years save three months passed before she was taught how to read it.

She concluded that sin is necessary and has no substance of its own; it is known only by the pain it causes. God regards fallen people as the lord regards the servant. Christ is a mother, who carries his children and feeds them with himself, and in the end all shall be well. She put the plain objection herself: since the Church teaches that many are damned, she could not see how all could be well. She was told only that what is impossible for her is not impossible for God, who will do a deed on the last day that no creature can know beforehand. She left it there, holding to the Church's teaching and to the promise together. Readers still disagree about whether her book implies that everyone is saved.

A woman writing theology in English had reason to be careful. In the short account Julian denies that she is a teacher. In 1401 Parliament made heresy punishable by burning. No record survives of her being questioned. Her long book was not printed until 1670 and found a wide public after 1901. The Catholic Church has never canonised her; the Church of England commemorates her on 8 May, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church quotes her assurance that all shall be well.

Key concepts

What does 'sin is behovable' mean in Julian of Norwich?

It means that sin had to be, that it plays a needful part, and Julian was told this without being told why. The sentence continues: but all shall be well. She does not call sin good. It is the cause of all the pain there is, and she would choose any pain over it. What she does report is that in heaven the mark of a repented sin becomes an honour, as with Peter and Mary Magdalene.

What does Julian mean by no wrath in God?

She means that anger exists only on the human side. In her visions she looked for it in God and saw none, and she gives a reason: anger comes from a lack of power, wisdom or goodness, and God lacks none of them. What people take for God's anger is their own resistance to peace and love. Forgiveness is therefore no change of mood in God. Mercy works on the anger in us.

What is the godly will in Julian's thought?

It is a will in every soul that is to be saved which has never consented to sin and never will. Julian sets it against what she calls a beastly will in the lower part of a person, which can want nothing good. The godly will goes on wanting good while the person does wrong, so what God loves in a sinner is really there. She warns against using this as a reason to sin more easily.

What is the great deed Julian says God will do?

It is an act God will perform on the last day, by which everything that is not well will be made well. Julian is told that there will be such a deed and nothing more: what it is and how it is done stay hidden from every creature until then. It is the only reply she receives when she objects that the Church teaches some are condemned for ever. She forbids guessing at it.

What does Julian mean by God as the ground of prayer?

She means that a prayer begins in God before it begins in the one who prays. The words she heard run: I am the ground of your asking. First it is my will that you have it, then I make you want it, then I make you ask for it. So a prayer does not depend on feeling anything. Someone who prays dry and empty, she says, pleases God as well as anyone.

What does it mean, for Julian, that God keeps us?

It means being held in existence and in love whatever happens, which is not the same as being protected from harm. The hazelnut in her palm lasts because God made it, loves it and keeps it. When she is shown that she herself will sin, the answer is: I keep you most surely. A person kept in this sense still falls and still suffers, and the fall does not make God love them less.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

All shall be well

How can everything end well if many souls are lost for ever? Julian put that objection to her own vision, and what she received was a promise without an explanation.

The famous words answered her grief over the harm sin has done: sin had to be, but all shall be well. She did not take them as leave to drop what the Church teaches about hell. Told only that what is impossible to her is not impossible to God, she writes of a deed God will do on the last day that no creature can know beforehand. Prying into it, she adds, only carries a person further from knowing. Promise and objection both stay in her book.

  • salvation
  • redemption
  • hope
  • divine providence
  • heaven
  • evil

Falling without being blamed

When someone does wrong, is God angry? Julian looked and saw anger only on the human side, which decides whether a person who has failed should regard themselves with horror or with pity.

A servant runs off eagerly on his lord's errand, falls into a hollow and lies there hurt, and the lord pities him and finds no fault. Almost twenty years went by before she could read that picture. From it she holds that sin has no substance of its own and is known only by the pain it causes, and that in every soul to be saved there is a will that never consented to it. Brooding over old sins, which people mistake for humility, she calls a foul blindness.

  • sin
  • repentance
  • mercy
  • human nature

Love as maker, keeper and mother

What keeps a small and breakable world in being, and what sort of love is it? Her two answers are a hazelnut lying in her palm and a mother feeding her child.

Everything that is made appeared to her as a thing no bigger than a hazelnut. It lasts, she was told, because God loves it. Her long book carries the thought into the Trinity: Christ is a mother who bears his children, feeds them with himself and may let them fall for their own good, though never be lost. A hurt child runs to its mother, and a sinner should do the same. Fifteen years after the visions she asked what they had meant and was given one word, love.

  • divine love
  • love
  • divine goodness
  • creation
  • trinity
  • incarnation
  • soul

Not spared, and not overcome

What may a person count on when prayer feels empty and trouble does not lift? Julian was promised no shelter from distress, only that distress would not win.

The last words spoken to her do not say she will be free of storm, toil or distress. They say she will not be overcome, and her practical teaching rests on that difference. A prayer made in dryness, with nothing felt, pleases God as well as any, because God is the ground of the asking and stirred it first. Of four kinds of fear only the reverent kind fully pleases him, and fear that pulls toward despair is to be put away. Impatience and despair are the two sicknesses she most wants healed.

  • suffering
  • fear
  • trust
  • prayer
  • faith
  • grace
  • divine presence

What a vision is worth, and to whom

Why should anyone trust what a gravely ill woman saw, the woman herself included? She doubted it first, and then argued that it had never been meant for her alone.

On the day of the visions she told a visitor she had raved, and was ashamed when he took the bleeding cross seriously. The showings do not make her good, she says, and they belong to all her fellow Christians, who gain more from them than she does if they love God better. Her short account denies that she is a teacher and then asks whether being a woman is a reason to stay silent about what God showed her. Everything she saw she measures against the faith of the Church.

  • revelation
  • religious experience
  • compassion
  • charity
  • humility
  • death

By the numbers

works held
2
passages traced
262
concepts traced
249
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “divine love” and “sin”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 25 pairings. 80 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
divine lovesin18
divine lovesalvation17
gracesalvation15
gracesin14
divine lovesuffering12
salvationsin11
divine providencesalvation10
faithsuffering10
salvationsuffering10
sinsuffering9
faithsalvation8
divine lovegrace7
divine providencesin6
gracesuffering6
faithgrace5
religious experiencesuffering5
divine providencesuffering4
faithreligious experience4
divine lovereligious experience3
divine providencefaith3
divine lovedivine providence2
divine lovefaith2
faithsin2
divine providencegrace1
religious experiencesin1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: suffering in Comfortable Words for Christ's Lovers, 30%.

Density 0% 30%

Concept density per work, chronological 2 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 51 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearsufferingdivine lovesinsalvationfaithgracedivine providencereligious experience
Comfortable Words for Christ's Lovers30%24%24%22%12%6%10%16%
Revelations of Divine Love20.3%22.6%22.6%23.6%17%19.3%11.3%3.8%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

THE SHOWINGS & THE SHORT ACCOUNT

  1. 1373 Comfortable Words for Christ's Lovers

    The earlier and shorter of her two accounts of the visions of May 1373, in twenty-five chapters. She later expanded it into Revelations of Divine Love.

    EN
  2. 1393 Revelations of Divine Love

    The book she is read for, eighty-six chapters built over two decades on the short account she wrote first. It is read here in Grace Warrack's modernised text of 1901, which made her widely known.

    EN
Begin a dialogue with Julian of Norwich

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.