Zen scholarJapan

Kaiten Nukariya

The Sōtō priest who answered the West's pessimistic Buddhism

1 work · 256 passages grounded

Lifespan
1867–1934
School
Zen
Also known as
Nukariya Kaiten

The mind

Zen tells its own beginning as a scene: the Buddha holds up a flower before an assembly, only his disciple Mahākāśyapa smiles, and the Buddha declares a transmission of the teaching outside the scriptures. The scripture usually cited for the scene is the Dafantian wang wenfo jueyi jing, the sūtra of the Great Brahmā King's questions to the Buddha. In 1905 Kaiten Nukariya, a Sōtō Zen priest and since 1901 the principal of one of his school's colleges, published a study arguing that this sūtra was apocryphal. The argument took away the scriptural support for the doctrine on which Zen rests its claim to authority: a special transmission outside the scriptures.

He came to that work from a modern training. Born in 1867, the year before the Meiji Restoration, he was ordained at ten in a Sōtō temple and took the name Kaiten. The new government separated Shinto from Buddhism, and many temples were destroyed in the years after 1868. From the Sōtō academy he went on in 1891, at twenty-four, to Keiō, the private school in Tokyo that taught Western learning, where he studied Buddhism with the methods of positivist scholarship. Nukariya translated Buddhism and Its Christian Critics by Paul Carus, a German-American writer on religion, and brought out an edition of Shutsujō kōgo, in which the eighteenth-century Osaka scholar Tominaga Nakamoto had argued that the Mahāyāna sūtras were not the Buddha's words. Many Buddhist scholars feared that a school resting on those sūtras would collapse if this were granted; Nukariya held that critical history could modernise Buddhism and leave the Mahāyāna its value.

In 1911 the Sōtō school sent him abroad for three years to study religion in America and Europe, and there he wrote The Religion of the Samurai in English, mostly from memory, its preface says, finishing it at Harvard Square in April 1913. Its central claim fits his scholarship. Zen, he argued, takes its authority from no scripture: the universe itself is its scripture, and the Buddha is a predecessor whose insight each practitioner sets out to equal, not a superhuman founder whose words must be obeyed. A Zen grounded in that way could lose a proof-text without losing anything it rested on. He wrote for Western readers who knew Buddhism through the older Pāli texts and called it pessimistic, and he argued in their terms, setting Zen beside the theory of evolution and disputing the Harvard psychologist Hugo Münsterberg on what gives a life value. The title carried a second argument as well: that Zen had come to Japan as the faith of the warrior class and had revived since the Russo-Japanese War as an ideal for the rising generation.

Back in Japan in 1914, Nukariya received a doctorate in 1915 and became head of the Sōtō school's university in 1921. When it became Komazawa University in 1925 he was its first president, and he gave it the principle gyōgaku ichinyo, practice and learning as one. He also completed a two-volume history of Zen thought in Japanese. In July 1934 he collapsed with a stroke while lecturing in Tokyo and died.

Key concepts

What does Nukariya mean when he calls people Buddha-natured?

He means human nature is neither good nor bad but the source beneath both. Good and bad acts, he argued, serve the same human interests and differ only in how widely they reach, so a bad act is a self drawn too narrow. Buddha-nature is the real self that, once awake, widens that circle. His image is a drunkard, poor only because he forgets the gem a friend put in his pocket.

What is Zen Activity?

Zen Activity is insight shown in an act instead of a statement: a master lifts a hair-brush, taps his chair with a staff or gives a loud shout. Nukariya counts it the third element of Zen, beside sitting meditation and doctrine, and the only one with no counterpart in other religions. It grew up in China after the Sixth Patriarch, and anything at hand, a cup, a bell, a cat, could serve it.

If there is no soul, what is the real self?

The real self is life itself, body and mind as one, always changing, not a fixed soul standing behind them. Nukariya traces it backward into his parents and their parents, outward into his fellow men and women, and down into plants, animals and even stone. His image is water: to know the nature of one drop truly is to know the river, the ocean and the cloud.

Why does Nukariya say reality is not hidden behind appearances?

Because a thing's appearances are the thing itself, known in different relations. Sunlight looks white through a pane of glass and spreads into a spectrum through a prism, and both are the one ray. Nothing more real hides behind them. A thing cut off from every relation, the philosophers' thing-in-itself, is simply a thing with no one knowing it, so calling it unknowable says nothing at all.

Why is Zen neither idealist nor nihilist in his account?

Zen borrows both moves and stops short of each. It uses the older Buddhist stress on change to loosen attachment, and idealism as a medicine against superstition and craving, but it never says that nothing exists or that to be is to be known. Waves, Nukariya argues, need water and reflections need a mirror: something real makes the passing things appear, and Universal Life is in things, not behind them.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

A Faith That Needs No Proof-Text

A priest trained in critical history knew that the texts his school quoted could fall. What a religion can stand on once no scripture is allowed to carry it is the question his whole work answers.

Nukariya never defended Zen by defending its sutras. Truth, he argued, passes from a teacher's mind to a pupil's, so a master can preach by stepping down from the pulpit in silence or recite the canon by bowing to a guest. Against the Western scholars who called the older Pāli Buddhism genuine and the Mahāyāna its decay, he answered that this would make the child the real man and every adult a degeneration. A faith resting there could lose a proof-text and keep its ground.

  • scriptural authority
  • textual criticism
  • religious authority
  • scriptural interpretation
  • zen history
  • buddhist studies
  • religious history
  • direct experience
  • teaching

A Buddha Without a Name

Every name for God, Brahman, Jehovah or Allah, brings a nation and a boundary with it. Whether a faith can worship what it refuses to name, and ask it for nothing, is what is at stake.

Zen's object of worship, Nukariya argued, cannot be fixed as God, Creator, Nature or Substance: the masters called it This One, Mind, the True, and changed the name at will. A faith that freezes its idea of the deity dies however respectable it looks, because living faith grows like a river. Even his own picture of the Buddha as wise and merciful he held to be provisional, open to what life has not yet unfolded. Worship, accordingly, asks for nothing and is thanksgiving.

  • universal spirit
  • religion
  • spirituality
  • religious practice
  • mahayana
  • experience
  • wisdom

Morals as a Widening Self

If good and bad acts serve the same human interests and differ only in how far those interests reach, a crime is a self drawn too small. How large a self can grow decides what a person can become.

Mencius called human nature good and Xunzi called it bad. Nukariya thought both erred in the predicate, not the subject: good and bad acts alike promote interests and differ in extent, one person's, one nation's, the world's. People are Buddha-natured, and the confused shrink that nature to a body and its wants, which makes them the smallest persons alive. Loyalty, chastity and generosity are one sincerity met in different relationships, and morality grows as the self widens toward all living things.

  • human nature
  • good and evil
  • moral psychology
  • ethics
  • virtue
  • compassion
  • moral development
  • buddha-nature
  • nonviolence

A Self Without a Soul

Western readers took the denial of the soul for nihilism. Whether a self with no immortal core is less than a person or more is the wager at the centre of his account of enlightenment.

Nukariya called belief in individual immortality a baseless assumption, rooted in the instinct of self-preservation. The real self he put in its place is changing life, body and mind at once: it lived in his forefathers, lives in his fellow men and in nature, and will live in later generations. He defended the world against two kinds of dissolution, the extreme idealism of Vasubandhu, which makes it a dream, and the unknowable thing-in-itself, which he called a thing with its knower removed.

  • no-self
  • immortality
  • mind-body problem
  • appearance and reality
  • idealism
  • epistemology
  • self-knowledge
  • interdependence
  • body

Optimism as a Discipline

Temperament does not settle whether a life feels worth living, he held, training does. What it takes to stay glad in a life made of conflict, without chasing pleasure or fleeing it, is where his thought ends.

Nukariya refused both of the West's options, the pessimist who counts pain as the only positive and the optimist who calls evil a mere absence. Life consists in conflict, he argued, and one circumstance pains one person and pleases another, as thermometers disagree in one climate. So the mind has to be trained: master of things first, then of the body, then of passion. The good are always repaid, he insisted, though in virtue and peace of mind rather than in wealth or a long life.

  • suffering
  • pessimism
  • happiness
  • adversity
  • equanimity
  • self-mastery
  • discipline
  • desire
  • karma
  • everyday life

By the numbers

works held
1
passages traced
256
concepts traced
472
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “buddha-nature” and “enlightenment”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 17 pairings. 90 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
buddha-natureenlightenment10
enlightenmentmeditation6
buddha-naturezen4
enlightenmentzen4
enlightenmentzen buddhism4
meditationzen4
meditationzen buddhism4
buddha-naturenature3
buddha-naturehuman nature2
buddha-naturemeditation2
enlightenmentnature2
naturezen2
buddha-naturezen history1
enlightenmenthuman nature1
enlightenmentzen history1
meditationzen history1
naturezen buddhism1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: enlightenment in The Religion of the Samurai, 13.3%.

Density 0% 13.3%

Concept density per work, chronological A single work. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 48 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearenlightenmentzenbuddha-naturemeditationzen buddhismnaturezen historyhuman nature
The Religion of the Samurai13.3%10.9%10.2%10.2%9.4%6.3%5.1%4.3%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1913 The Religion of the Samurai (The Religion of the Samurai: A Study of Zen Philosophy and Discipline in China and Japan)

    His case for Zen, written in English for Western readers during the three-year study tour of America and Europe on which the Sōtō school had sent him.

    EN
Begin a dialogue with Kaiten Nukariya

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.