The Way that cannot be named
Can the source of everything be spoken of at all? The book opens by saying that a Tao (a Way) which can be walked or named is not the lasting one, and then speaks of it for eighty-one chapters.
The Tao is what was there before heaven and earth: still, formless, the mother of all things, and nameless, so that 'Tao' is only a label given for want of a name. It brings things forth and feeds them without owning or ruling them. It cannot be seen, heard or grasped, and its use lies in what is empty: the hub of a wheel, the hollow of a clay vessel, the door and windows of a room. Opposites give rise to each other, and the Tao returns once it has gone far. Those who know it, the book says, do not talk about it.
- tao
- cosmology
- ineffability
- paradox
- complementarity
- knowledge
Enter a dialogue
- A name that can be named is not the lasting name, your opening says. Why then call the nameless source of things 'the Way'?
- Those who know the Tao (the Way) do not speak of it, and those who speak do not know. What does that make of this book?
- Thirty spokes meet at an empty hub, and a jar is useful because it is hollow. Why do you find a thing's worth in what is missing?
- Nobody needs to leave the house to understand the world, and the farther a person travels the less they know. What kind of knowledge do you mean?
- When the least able scholars hear of the Tao (the Way), they laugh, and otherwise it would not be the Way. Why is mockery a good sign?