No Self, Yet Deeds Bear Fruit
Nāgasena denies any lasting self and still holds that every deed comes home to whoever inherits it. How both can be true at once is the question, and he answers it in pictures a king can check.
The king's objection is the natural one: if no one persists, no one is reborn and no one deserves blame. Nāgasena answers it without conceding a soul. A life runs on as a process, each stage arising from the one before, and what carries it forward is not a self but craving, so a person who dies without craving is not born again. Because the later stage comes from the earlier, its deeds come with it, and because deeds differ, births differ, as plants differ by their seeds.
- karma
- rebirth
- causation
- moral responsibility
- death
- impermanence
- analogy
- knowledge
Enter a dialogue
- If a self sat inside us looking out through the senses as through windows, why could it not see through the ear or hear through the eye?
- Some are born sickly and others healthy, some poor and others rich. Why do you answer the king with plants that taste different because their seeds differ?
- One man dies and is reborn in the highest heaven, another in nearby Kashmir. Why do both arrive at the same moment?
- If pain is the fruit of past deeds, why did the Buddha, free of every evil, still bleed from a splinter of rock?
- Pressed with the hardest questions, you answer almost always with a comparison from farms, kitchens or battlefields. Why should a comparison persuade where a definition would not?