Get started

WorkNiccolò Machiavelli

Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius

Machiavelli's other masterpiece: a republican's commentary on ancient Rome, arguing that free peoples — not strong princes — build states that last, and complicating everything *The Prince* seems to say.

by Niccolò Machiavelli535 passages held

  • English, a translation held here, and your language
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work See it in context
First published
(published posthumously)
Original language
Italian

Report a rights issue

Overview

The man who wrote a handbook for princes wrote, at nearly the same time, a long defence of self-governing republics — and could get neither into print. Composed between about 1514 and 1519, in the years just after The Prince, the Discourses on Livy hang a sprawling political education on the first ten books of the Roman historian Livy, taking the rise of the Roman republic as a standing example of how a free people keeps itself free. Its judgements reverse the caricature of their author. Liberty, not a strong ruler, produces greatness; the endless quarrels between Rome's common people and its senate, far from weakening the city, were the friction that kept it free; and a state is better defended by its own armed citizens than by any mercenary or prince. The book grew out of debates in a Florentine garden among younger republicans, to two of whom it is dedicated, and like The Prince it appeared only after Machiavelli's death, in 1531. Set beside its notorious sibling it opens the enduring puzzle of Machiavelli studies — whether one author was teaching tyrants how to hold subjects down, or teaching subjects how to keep from being held. Rousseau, reading the pair, decided The Prince was a trap laid for princes and its author a republican in disguise, and pointed to these Discourses as his evidence.

Key concepts

Why does Machiavelli use Livy and ancient Rome?

He hangs the whole work on the first ten books of the historian Livy, taking the rise of the Roman republic as a proven example of how a free people keeps itself free. For Machiavelli the ancients are not mere history but a working laboratory: their successes and failures reveal the enduring patterns of political life, which he thinks his own age foolishly declines to study and imitate.

Why does he defend conflict between the classes?

Because he holds that Rome's quarrels between the plebeians and the senate, far from weakening the city, produced the very laws and institutions that guarded its liberty. The friction of contending orders, kept within legal bounds, checks the ambition of any one part and keeps power from concentrating. It is a deliberate reversal of the usual praise of civic harmony, which Machiavelli thinks breeds either tyranny or decay.

What does Machiavelli mean by corruption?

Not merely bribery but the decay of civic virtue — the point at which citizens put private ambition and interest above the common good, so that free institutions no longer function. A corrupt people cannot sustain liberty even with good laws, because the spirit that made the laws work is gone. Much of the Discourses studies how corruption spreads and whether a state can be dragged back toward its founding principles.

Why does he prefer citizen armies to mercenaries?

Because a republic defended by its own armed citizens has soldiers with a stake in its survival, while mercenaries fight only for pay and a prince's troops answer only to him. Hired and foreign arms are, in his view, useless and dangerous — the reliable defence of liberty is a disciplined citizenry trained to bear arms for its own state. Arms and freedom are, for Machiavelli, bound together.

How do the Discourses complicate The Prince?

The same author who advised a single ruler on holding power here mounts a sustained defence of self-governing republics and popular liberty. Set side by side, the two works make Machiavelli's real allegiance a genuine scholarly puzzle: is he teaching tyrants to dominate or subjects to stay free? Rousseau read the pair and concluded The Prince was a trap for princes, citing these Discourses as the proof of a hidden republican.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Liberty, not a strong hand, builds greatness

What makes a state grow powerful and endure — a commanding ruler, or a free people governing itself? Machiavelli reads Rome and answers against the caricature of his own name.

Taking the rise of the Roman republic as his standing example, Machiavelli argues that liberty, not a single strong ruler, is what produces lasting greatness: free peoples fight harder, grow richer and last longer, because citizens who share in rule identify the common good with their own. It is the reversal that makes his real politics a genuine question, set beside The Prince's counsel to autocrats. Rousseau, reading the pair, judged the author a republican in disguise and pointed here for proof. The wager is that self-government is not only just but the more effective form.

  • republicanism
  • liberty
  • civic virtue
  • governance
  • political legitimacy
  • leadership
  • meritocracy
  • virtue
  • political stability

Enter a dialogue

The quarrels that kept Rome free

Are internal conflict and discord a sign that a state is failing? Machiavelli takes the opposite view, finding in Rome's endless disputes the very friction that preserved its freedom.

The perpetual quarrels between Rome's common people and its senate, far from weakening the city, were the tension that kept it free — producing the laws and institutions in favour of liberty that a placid state never generates. Against a long tradition that prized concord above all, Machiavelli defends conflict as productive, provided it stays within law and does not curdle into faction or corruption. When a people loses its civic virtue and grows corrupt, no institution can save its liberty. Health lies not in silence but in a balance of contending forces held open, not suppressed.

  • political stability
  • human nature
  • authority
  • political psychology
  • corruption
  • liberty
  • conspiracy
  • civic virtue
  • war

Enter a dialogue

Its own arms, and the rot that ends it

How does a free state defend itself, and how does it die? Machiavelli ties survival to citizens who bear their own arms and decay to the corruption that hollows a people out.

A state is better defended by its own armed citizens than by any mercenary or prince, because hired soldiers have no stake in the cause and a prince's army answers only to him. Discipline, good order and the readiness of the many to fight for the republic are the ground of its liberty. Decay comes from within: as private ambition and corruption spread, civic virtue fails, and the same institutions that once kept a people free become instruments of tyranny. Renewal, Machiavelli argues, means dragging a state back to its founding principles before the rot is complete.

  • military strategy
  • warfare
  • discipline
  • corruption
  • tyranny
  • statecraft
  • necessity
  • prudence
  • meritocracy

Enter a dialogue

Within this work

passages held
535
distinct concepts
662
by passages held, corpus-wide
#138

What this book thinks together

The wheel takes this book’s leading concepts and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more of its passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “military strategy” and “war”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 19 pairings. 90 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
military strategywar14
republicanismtyranny11
civic virtuerepublicanism9
political violencetyranny9
leadershipmilitary strategy8
political violencerepublicanism6
republican governmenttyranny6
civic virtuerepublican government5
leadershipwar5
military strategyrepublican government4
republicanismwar3
leadershiprepublicanism2
political violencerepublican government2
civic virtueleadership1
civic virtuetyranny1
civic virtuewar1
leadershiprepublican government1
leadershiptyranny1
political violencewar1

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1503 Minor Political Writings (Scritti politici minori)

    Written on the job rather than for readers: the reports and memoranda of a working diplomat, most of them from before his fall in 1512.

     EN
  2. 1521 The Art of War (Dell'arte della guerra)

    A companion, in dialogue form, to the Discourses on Livy. Machiavelli had dedicated that book to Cosimo Rucellai and Zanobi Buondelmonti, and both reappear here as listeners while a soldier turns ancient military practice into a programme for a modern state.

     EN
  3. 1531 Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius you are here EN
  4. 1532 History of Florence (Istorie fiorentine)

    His last large work turns the questions of the Discourses on Livy on the past of his own city. Like The Prince and the Discourses, it reached print only after his death.

     EN
  5. 1532 The Prince

    Machiavelli's most famous and shortest book, written in 1513 and published in 1532. Read for centuries as a tyrant's manual — a reading its republican companion, the Discourses on Livy, complicates.

     DEEN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works