Sizing up a power: money, arms, obedience
What actually makes a state formidable, and what only makes it look so? Machiavelli answers from the German free cities, the emperor and the French crown, and finds the answer less in size than in money, arms and whether a people will obey.
Germany, he reports, abounds in men and money, yet its strength cannot be used. The free cities keep a year's grain, drink and fuel in public stores and arm their own citizens, but they want to keep their liberty rather than enlarge it, and will not spend equally on a conquest whose profit would go to the princes. France is the reverse: estates without heirs have fallen to the crown, barons who once rebelled now submit, and a people that venerates its king costs little to guard. The cities' power is great, he concludes, but no one can avail himself of it.
- political power
- public finance
- monarchy
- military organization
- hereditary succession
- political fragmentation
- collective action
- liberty
- discipline
- war
Enter a dialogue
- German free cities kept a year's grain, drink and fuel in public stores, so no siege could starve them. Why is a full storehouse real power?
- Some people keep earning more and still feel poor. What did the rich German townsmen, who lived as if poor, understand about need?
- French commoners obey the king from reverence, while his barons obey in hope of one day inheriting the crown. Which loyalty would you trust in a crisis?
- You admit that much in your reports is passed on only as you heard it. Why should a government decide war or peace on such a report?
- German cities had men, money and full storehouses, yet their power was of little use to the emperor. What separates having strength from being able to command it?