Virtue Kept at Home
Must a person leave family and goods behind to be good, or can the good life be led in an ordinary household? The Kural answers for the household, and then asks more of it than any hermitage would.
Aṟam, the first of the book's three aims, belongs to the householder: whoever feeds the guest, helps the pilgrim and keeps a family well is called greatest among those who seek salvation, and no robe or matted hair is needed. Yet the demands are severe. Not killing ranks above even truthfulness, refusing meat above a thousand fire sacrifices, and an injury is to be answered with a kindness that shames the one who did it. Holiness worn as a costume is exposed as a fowler hiding in a bush.
- virtue
- compassion
- nonviolence
- generosity
- integrity
- self-control
- anger
Enter a dialogue
- Of all who seek salvation, you rank first those who lead a good family life. Why should a householder outrank the ascetic who has left everything?
- A falsehood that brings only good counts as truth by your definition. Does that make a kind lie more honest than a wounding fact?
- Someone has been badly wronged and wants to get even. Why would doing the offender a kindness punish him better than revenge?
- Refusing meat, in your reckoning, is worth more than a thousand sacrifices in the sacred fire. Why should what someone eats outweigh the great rites of worship?
- A man in holy dress who does evil is like a bird-catcher hiding in a bush. What gives such a person away?