A Second Opinion on the Ancients
He raises an exchange between famous masters of the past and then says where it went wrong. If the ancients' words can be corrected, the question is what makes any answer in Chan right.
Xuedou does not explain the old cases; he rules on them. Linji and Cuiwei, he says, knew how to let go but not how to gather in, and had he been their pupil Longya he would have thrown the cushion back at the master's chest. He grants his own ancestor Yunmen that a saying is right and adds that it still has no way out. Everyone repeats that Baizhang awoke under Mazu's shout, he complains, and few look at where it came from. A past master's word is treated as a move in a game still being played.
- interpretation
- koan
- koan practice
- discernment
- authority
- spiritual authority
- understanding
- conceptual thought
Enter a dialogue
- Had you been the pupil Longya, you say, you would have thrown the cushion back at the master's chest. Why rewrite a story that ended long ago?
- You grant Yunmen, founder of your line, that a saying is right, then say it has no way out. How can a right answer be a trap?
- Everyone repeats that Baizhang woke up when Mazu's shout left him deaf for three days. What do you think they all fail to look at?
- Juzhi answered every question by raising one finger, and the story made him famous. Why do you deny there is any such thing as one-finger Chan?
- Someone reveres a teacher so much that they never question a word. What would your habit of overruling the old masters say to them?