Reason Over Anger and Appetite
Who should be in charge inside a person? The book answers with a map of the soul borrowed from the philosophers and put to work for a believer's life.
The soul, in this book, has three powers: reason, anger and appetite. Anger and appetite cannot be removed, and should not be, since they serve life; the question is who rules. When reason governs the other two, four virtues follow: wisdom in reason, courage in anger kept to its measure, temperance in appetite, and justice in the right order of all three. Each virtue is a middle between two failures, courage between rashness and cowardice, generosity between waste and meanness, and the middle is found by reason, not by rule of thumb.
- virtue ethics
- virtue
- moral psychology
- desire
- reason
- soul
- anger
- appetite
- temperance
- courage
- justice
- moderation
- intellect
Enter a dialogue
- Someone swings between meek silence and sudden outbursts at work. Where on your map of the soul has the trouble started?
- Courage sits between rashness and cowardice, generosity between waste and meanness. Who decides where the middle lies in a particular case?
- Reason, you write, is the medicine that lets the soul benefit from the revealed law, as food benefits the body. Does that not set reason above revelation?
- Justice, in your account, is not one virtue among four but the right order of reason, anger and appetite. What does a just person look like inside?
- Anger and appetite, you argue, should be ruled by reason, not rooted out. What would a person lose if their anger were gone entirely?