TheologianEngland

Anselm of Canterbury

The monk who found God in a definition

12 works · 846 passages grounded

Lifespan
1033–~1109
Wikipedia

The mind

The monks of Bec, a Benedictine abbey in Normandy, wanted their prior's teaching about God in writing, and they set the terms: nothing was to be proved from the authority of Scripture, the arguments were to be plain, and even the objections of simple people had to be answered. Anselm refused for a long time, then wrote the Monologion in the mid-1070s. Those conditions became the project of his life. A Christian already believes that God exists and that God became man; Anselm held that the believer should go on to understand why these things must be so, by reason, in steps an unbeliever could follow. His next book first bore the title Faith Seeking Understanding, and scholars still use the phrase to name his method.

He had come to Bec for its teacher. At twenty-three Anselm left Aosta, crossed the Alps, and after three years in Burgundy and France reached Normandy in 1059, drawn by Lanfranc, a scholar from Pavia whose school at Bec was known above all for dialectic, the art of logical argument. Anselm entered the abbey as a novice in 1060 and became prior in 1063, when Lanfranc left to be abbot of Caen. Lanfranc, by then Archbishop of Canterbury, read the Monologion and objected that it argued without citing the Church Fathers, Augustine above all. Anselm answered him in a letter and kept the method.

The Monologion had needed a long chain of arguments, and Anselm wanted a single one that would need nothing but itself. In the preface to the Proslogion, composed in 1077 and 1078, he says the search gave him no rest; he tried to put it out of his mind, and then one day it came to him. The argument starts from a definition that even the man who denies God can understand: God is a being so great that nothing greater can be thought. Such a being exists at least in the mind of anyone who understands the words. But a being that also existed in reality would be greater still, so the greatest conceivable being cannot exist in the mind alone. God exists — and, Anselm went on, cannot even be thought not to exist.

Gaunilo, a monk of Marmoutier near Tours, replied with an island that no one can find but that is richer than every other land: by the same reasoning, he said, it would have to exist. Anselm answered that the reasoning applied to one being only, and asked that the objection and his reply be copied with the book. Thomas Aquinas rejected the argument in the thirteenth century; René Descartes built his own version in the seventeenth. Immanuel Kant objected that existence adds nothing to the idea of a thing, and classed proofs of this kind as ontological, the name the argument still carries. In the twentieth century Norman Malcolm and Alvin Plantinga rebuilt it with the logic of what is possible and what is necessary, and philosophers still dispute whether Gaunilo's island defeats it.

After Lanfranc died in 1089, King William II, known as William Rufus, kept Canterbury vacant for four years and took its revenues. In March 1093 the king fell ill at Gloucester, believed he was dying, and named Anselm. Eadmer, the Canterbury monk who became Anselm's companion and biographer, reports that Anselm refused and that the bishops forced the pastoral staff into his hand. One question dominated his fifteen years as archbishop: whether king or pope governed the church in England. In 1097 Anselm went to Rome without the king's permission and was not allowed back.

In exile in 1098 he finished Why God Became Man, which applies to the cross itself the terms the monks of Bec had set. Setting aside everything known of Christ, it argues by reason alone that sin takes from God the honour owed to him. Humanity owes the debt, but only God has anything great enough to pay it, so only someone who is both God and man can pay it. The book broke with the older view that Christ's death paid a ransom to the devil. Its account, called the satisfaction theory, passed through Aquinas into Western teaching on the atonement; John Calvin's teaching that Christ bore the punishment for sin is usually traced back to it.

King Henry I recalled Anselm in 1100 but claimed the same rights over bishops, and a second exile followed from 1103 to 1107. After the king gave up handing new bishops the ring and staff of their office in 1107, Anselm finished De Concordia, which argues that God's foreknowledge, predestination and grace leave room for free human choice. He died on 21 April 1109, leaving unfinished a dialogue on possibility, necessity and freedom, of which only fragments survive.

Key concepts

What does “that than which nothing greater can be thought” mean?

It is the definition of God the Proslogion argues from: whatever God is, nothing greater can even be thought. Anyone can understand the phrase, even the fool of the Psalm who denies God. But if such a being existed only in the mind, a greater one could be thought, one that also exists in reality. So it must exist in reality, and cannot even be thought not to exist.

What are “necessary reasons”, and why argue without Scripture?

Necessary reasons are arguments whose conclusions follow from premises anyone can grant, with no appeal to the authority of Scripture. The monks of Bec asked for exactly this. The method lets a believer understand why what he believes must be so, and lets an unbeliever check every step. Why God Became Man sets Christ aside, as if nothing were known of him, and still arrives at the need for a God-man.

What is rightness, and why does it come up everywhere?

Rightness is a thing being as it ought to be, doing what it was made for. A statement is right, and so true, when it says that what is so is so; a will is right when it wills what it ought. Justice is rightness of will kept for its own sake, and free choice is the power to keep it, so truth, justice and freedom turn out to be one idea seen three ways.

What is free choice, if not the power to sin?

Free choice is the power to keep the will’s rightness for the sake of that rightness itself. The usual definition, the power to sin and not to sin, fails because God and the good angels cannot sin and are no less free for it. No temptation can force a will that refuses to consent, and not even God takes its rightness away against its will.

What does satisfaction mean in the account of the cross?

Satisfaction is a repayment that restores the honour a wrong took away; every sin must be followed either by satisfaction or by punishment. Because sin takes from God the honour owed to him, the repayment must be greater than the whole created world. Humanity owes it and cannot pay, God could pay and owes nothing, so only someone who is both God and man can make it.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

Faith Seeking Understanding

Should a believer rest in believing, or go on to see why what is believed must be so? Everything turns on whether reason, working without Scripture, can reach what faith already holds.

The monks of Bec set the terms, and he kept them for life: nothing proved from the authority of Scripture, plain arguments, even the objections of simple people answered. Faith is not in question; what it asks for is understanding, in steps an unbeliever could follow. Lanfranc protested that the Church Fathers went uncited, and the method stayed. Hence the close attention to words, keeping apart what a word signifies and what it names, and the refusal to argue with the Greek church from anything but premises both churches confessed.

  • faith and reason
  • theological method
  • understanding
  • faith
  • scripture
  • scriptural interpretation
  • logic
  • syllogism
  • definition
  • semantics
  • signification
  • predication
  • reference
  • language
  • theological language
  • analogy

Than Which Nothing Greater

Can a definition that even a denier understands show that God exists? At stake is whether thinking about God, done carefully enough, already reaches him.

God is that than which nothing greater can be thought, and such a being cannot exist in the mind alone, because one that existed in reality as well would be greater. The fool of the Psalm understands the words, and that is enough to start. From the same principle follow God's justice, mercy, simplicity and eternity, and the Monologion had already reasoned its way to Father, Word and the love between them. Gaunilo's lost island was answered as fitting one being only. The argument has never been let alone since.

  • ontological argument
  • existence
  • necessary existence
  • divine attributes
  • divine nature
  • divine essence
  • divine simplicity
  • divine unity
  • divine goodness
  • goodness
  • eternity
  • time
  • space and time
  • creation
  • metaphysics
  • trinity
  • trinitarian theology
  • divine word
  • divine procession
  • holy spirit
  • divine relations
  • divine persons
  • divine love

Rightness Kept for Its Own Sake

Is someone free because they could do wrong, or because nothing can make them give up what is right? The answer redraws what truth, justice and freedom have in common.

One word runs through the dialogues: rightness. A statement is true when it does what statements are for, justice is rightness of will kept for its own sake, and free choice is the power to keep it. God and the good angels cannot sin, so the power to sin is no part of freedom. Evil is nothing, the absence of a good that ought to be there. God's foreknowledge, the last treatise argues, includes the fact that some things happen freely, so it cannot be wrong about them yet does not force them.

  • truth
  • justice
  • rectitude
  • moral rectitude
  • free will
  • will
  • divine will
  • evil
  • privation
  • angelology
  • happiness
  • beatitude
  • desire
  • moral responsibility
  • agency
  • necessity
  • divine foreknowledge
  • divine knowledge
  • predestination
  • grace
  • divine grace
  • divine providence

The Debt Only God Could Pay

If God is merciful, why should anyone have to die for sin at all? The answer, put in terms of honour and debt, passed through Aquinas into Western teaching on the cross.

Sin takes from God the honour owed to him, and what was taken must be repaid with something greater than the whole created world. Humanity owes it and cannot pay; God could pay and owes nothing; so the payment can only come from one who is both. With Christ set aside, he argued this by reason alone for unbelievers who called the faith unreasonable, and broke with the older view of a ransom paid to the devil. The same unpayable debt, carried by human nature, is his account of original sin.

  • sin
  • original sin
  • inheritance
  • conception
  • atonement
  • satisfaction
  • redemption
  • salvation
  • incarnation
  • divine justice
  • divine mercy
  • punishment
  • forgiveness
  • injustice
  • obedience
  • merit
  • suffering
  • human nature

By the numbers

works held
12
passages traced
846
concepts traced
563
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “free will” and “moral responsibility”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 16 pairings. 89 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
free willmoral responsibility40
justicemoral responsibility28
free willsin26
free willjustice24
justicewill23
incarnationtrinity21
moral responsibilitysin20
justicesin13
free willwill12
moral responsibilitywill11
free willincarnation8
sinwill6
incarnationsin4
incarnationjustice1
semanticstrinity1
sintrinity1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: free will in On Freedom of Choice, 88.6%.

Density 0% 88.6%

Concept density per work, chronological 12 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 82 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearfree willtrinityjusticemoral responsibilitysinwillsemanticsincarnation
Monologion0%29.9%2.8%0.7%0%0.7%0%0%
Proslogion0%4.3%0%0%8.5%0%0%0%
Reply to Gaunilo0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
De Grammatico0%0%0%0%0%0%61%0%
On Truth2.2%0%23.9%23.9%0%23.9%6.5%0%
On Freedom of Choice88.6%0%8.6%25.7%31.4%14.3%0%0%
On the Fall of the Devil47.4%0%29.5%21.8%12.8%17.9%10.3%0%
On the Incarnation of the Word1.8%56.4%0%0%0%0%1.8%41.8%
Why God Became Man21.1%2%7.2%6.6%23%0.7%0%22.4%
On the Virgin Conception and Original Sin7.8%0%29.7%18.8%14.1%12.5%0%10.9%
On the Procession of the Holy Spirit0%63.6%0%0%0%0%0%2.3%
De Concordia (The Compatibility of God's Foreknowledge, Predestination, and Grace with Human Freedom)53.3%0%24%22.7%10.7%20%0%0%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

PRIOR OF BEC — FROM MANY ARGUMENTS TO ONE

  1. 1076 Monologion

    The earliest of Anselm's books about God and the longest he wrote at Bec, composed in the mid-1070s while he was still prior there.

    LA
  2. 1078 Proslogion

    The book by which Anselm is known: twenty-six short chapters composed at Bec in 1077 and 1078, a year or two after the Monologion.

    LA
  3. 1078 Reply to Gaunilo (Liber apologeticus contra Gaunilonem)

    A treatise Anselm did not choose to write: his answer to a critic of the Proslogion, in which he restates its argument point by point.

    LA

ABBOT OF BEC — TRUTH, FREEDOM & THE FALL

  1. 1080 De Grammatico (De grammatico)

    The odd one out on Anselm's shelf: a short exercise in logic for beginners, of disputed date, which he refused to count among his dialogues on Scripture.

    LA
  2. 1080 On Truth (De veritate)

    The first of three dialogues Anselm wrote at Bec in the 1080s and later arranged as a set, with On Freedom of Choice and On the Fall of the Devil.

    LA
  3. 1085 On Freedom of Choice (De libertate arbitrii)

    Builds on the definition of justice reached in On Truth, and supplies the account of the will that On the Fall of the Devil then tests on the first sin of all.

    LA
  4. 1085 On the Fall of the Devil (De casu diaboli)

    The longest of the three dialogues from Bec and Anselm's fullest account of evil, worked out on the case of the angels who fell.

    LA

ARCHBISHOP & EXILE — WHY GOD BECAME MAN

  1. 1094 On the Incarnation of the Word (Epistola de incarnatione Verbi)

    A letter turned treatise, begun by the abbot of Bec around 1092 and finished by the Archbishop of Canterbury two years later, addressed to the pope.

    LA
  2. 1098 Why God Became Man (Cur Deus homo)

    The founding text of the satisfaction theory of the atonement, in two books, completed during Anselm's first exile from England.

    LA
  3. 1099 On the Virgin Conception and Original Sin (De conceptu virginali et de originali peccato)

    A sequel to Why God Became Man, written a year later for Boso, the questioner of that dialogue, to give a second answer to a question it had raised.

    LA
  4. 1102 On the Procession of the Holy Spirit (De processione Spiritus Sancti)

    Given first as a speech at a council and written up four years later: the treatise in which Anselm argues not with a pupil or a critic but with another church.

    LA

THE LAST TREATISE — FOREKNOWLEDGE & GRACE

  1. 1107 De Concordia (The Compatibility of God's Foreknowledge, Predestination, and Grace with Human Freedom) (De concordia praescientiae et praedestinationis et gratiae Dei cum libero arbitrio)

    Anselm's last completed treatise, written in 1107 and 1108 after his second exile, and his answer to a question the student had raised in On Freedom of Choice more than twenty years before.

    LA
Begin a dialogue with Anselm of Canterbury

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.