PhilosopherEngland

John Locke

The physician who made every authority show its warrant

12 works · 4,428 passages grounded

Lifespan
1632–1704
School
Empiricism
Wikipedia

The mind

Between 1660 and 1662 a young tutor at Christ Church, Oxford, wrote two essays arguing that a ruler may lawfully decide how his subjects worship. He was answering Edward Bagshaw, a colleague at the same college, who wanted Protestants outside the national church left alone. The tutor was John Locke, and he had grown up in a civil war. His father, a country lawyer in Somerset, served as a captain in Parliament's cavalry. Locke was a pupil at Westminster School in January 1649, when Charles I was beheaded at Whitehall, a few hundred yards away. He wrote of himself that he had been in a storm for as long as he had known anything.

Those two essays stayed unprinted until 1967, and the books Locke is remembered for argue the other side. One claim runs through all of them: nothing is settled at birth. No idea is in the mind before experience puts it there, and no person is born the subject of another. A doctrine, a church or a king that asks to be obeyed has to show where its authority comes from.

He came to politics through medicine. Oxford taught the philosophy of Aristotle, and Locke found it of little use; what held him was the experimental science of Robert Boyle, the chemist who became his mentor, and the training of a physician. In 1666 Lord Ashley, one of the richest men in England, came to Oxford to drink medicinal waters, met Locke and soon took him into his London household. The next year Locke wrote an essay on toleration that reversed his answer to Bagshaw, and scholars point to his new association with Ashley as the likeliest cause. In 1668 he oversaw an operation that drained an abscess on Ashley's liver, and Ashley credited him with saving his life.

Ashley became Earl of Shaftesbury and led the campaign in Parliament to keep the Catholic heir, the future James II, from the throne. The campaign failed; Shaftesbury fled to Holland at the end of 1682, and Locke left for Holland too in the autumn of 1683. In November 1684 Charles II had him expelled from Christ Church, although the dean reported that nobody in the college had heard him say a word for or against the government. The next year his name stood on a list of eighty-four men whom England asked the Dutch to hand over, and he lived in Amsterdam under the name Dr van der Linden.

He came home in February 1689, after James II had fallen. He was fifty-six and had almost nothing in print. Within a year three books were out. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, which he signed, argues that every idea comes from the senses or from the mind watching its own workings, so that much of what people call knowledge is well-grounded belief. Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration, both unsigned, make the matching case about power: rulers hold it in trust from people who consented to it and may be replaced when they break that trust, and no government can force a mind into belief. Locke admitted writing the Two Treatises only in an addition to his will, six weeks before he died.

In 1703 the heads of the Oxford colleges agreed that tutors should not read the Essay with their pupils. The book spread anyway, and the language of the Two Treatises is echoed in the American Declaration of Independence.

The limits Locke set are part of the record too. His toleration left out atheists, and it left out churches whose members owe obedience to a foreign prince, a clause aimed at Catholics. As Ashley's secretary he wrote out the 1669 constitution for the colony of Carolina, which gave every free settler absolute power over his African slaves; historians disagree about how much of it was his own thinking. He also held shares in the Royal African Company, which shipped enslaved people across the Atlantic.

Key concepts

What does Locke mean by calling the mind white paper?

He means that a mind begins with no ideas and no principles of its own, and that everything it later thinks with was supplied by experience. Experience has two sources: the senses, and the mind’s notice of its own workings. Nobody, for instance, has the idea of a colour they have never seen. Whatever is claimed to be inborn is, for Locke, something learned so early that its origin has been forgotten.

What makes someone the same person over time?

Consciousness does, not the body and not the soul. A person, for Locke, is a thinking being that can regard itself as itself at different times, so whoever is aware of a past deed as their own is the same person as the one who did it. He calls “person” a forensic term, a word from the courtroom: it settles whose action something was, and so who deserves the praise or the punishment.

What does Locke mean by uneasiness?

Uneasiness is the discomfort of lacking something one wants, and Locke holds that this discomfort, not the greatest good a person has in view, is what moves the will. A drunkard knows the tavern is ruining him and goes anyway, because at this moment he misses his companions. People are free, on this account, because the mind can suspend a desire and examine whether satisfying it serves its true happiness.

How do faith and reason relate for Locke?

Reason judges whether something is a revelation, and faith then accepts what the revelation says. Faith, for Locke, is assent to a statement on the credit of God, who cannot lie, but only reason can check that it is God who speaks. A feeling of certainty is no such check, which is his objection to the people he calls enthusiasts. A revelation may teach what lies beyond reason, never what contradicts clear knowledge.

Why does Locke say government rests on consent?

Because people are by nature free and equal, nobody has authority over another unless it has been given. Consent is that giving: people agree to form one society and to be bound by its majority, so that a known law and an impartial judge replace each person’s private enforcement of his rights. Locke distinguishes express consent, an open declaration, from tacit consent, which he reads into owning land or living under a government’s protection.

Why does Locke call political power a trust?

A trust is power lent for a purpose and recoverable when the purpose is betrayed. Locke describes the offices of rulers and lawmakers in this way: they exist to preserve the lives, liberties and possessions of the governed. A ruler who uses force without right, for example by setting his own will in place of the law, has put himself into a state of war with his people, and they may resist him and set up a new government.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

Nothing Is Settled at Birth

If neither knowledge nor character nor rank arrives with a child, where does each of them come from? Locke’s answer leaves the making of a person to experience and upbringing, and no appeal to nature can any longer be taken for granted.

Locke denied that any principle of logic or of morals is stamped on the mind before experience. The Essay calls the newborn mind white paper and fills it through the senses and through the mind’s attention to its own workings. Some Thoughts Concerning Education draws the practical consequence, that early habit decides far more of the adult than any gift of birth, and Of the Conduct of the Understanding says the same of reasoning, which grows by practice like any other skill. A truth that everyone is said to be born with was, for him, an opinion nobody had examined.

  • innate ideas
  • ideas
  • sensation
  • perception
  • empiricism
  • education
  • child development
  • parenting
  • moral education
  • discipline

Reason as the Last Judge

What may claim a person’s assent: a tradition, a learned word, an inner certainty, a revelation? Locke hears each of them and leaves the verdict to reason, which must weigh the evidence even for truths it could not have found alone.

Certain knowledge, for Locke, reaches only a short way. Beyond it lie probability and trust in testimony, and there the task is to weigh the evidence honestly. He applied that rule in every direction. Learned terms that stand for no clear idea are exposed as noise in the third book of the Essay. Enthusiasts who feel sure that God speaks in them are told that strong conviction proves nothing. Revelation itself must show its credentials to reason, which is why The Reasonableness of Christianity reads the Gospels as a plain text, and why he told Bishop Stillingfleet that faith and knowledge are two different things.

  • knowledge
  • certainty
  • evidence
  • belief
  • reason
  • truth
  • faith
  • revelation
  • miracles
  • language
  • meaning
  • judgment
  • skepticism

A Self That Answers for Its Acts

What makes a person the owner of a past action, and what makes a present choice free? Locke looks for both in what a mind is aware of and can hold back, and leaves open what the soul is made of.

A person, Locke held, reaches as far back as consciousness does: whoever can recognise a past action as their own is the one who did it, whatever body or soul has changed in the meantime. Freedom he placed in a matching power. Desire presses as a present unease, yet the mind can suspend acting on it until it has considered, and in that pause he found the liberty human beings have. Whether the thing that thinks is immaterial he declined to decide, and he told Bishop Stillingfleet that the resurrection rests on God’s promise, not on a theory of substance.

  • personal identity
  • consciousness
  • memory
  • mind
  • mind-body problem
  • motivation
  • resurrection
  • substance
  • virtue

Power Held in Trust

By what right does one person command another, or keep what others lack? Locke starts from people who are free and equal by nature, and makes every claim to rule or to own answer to a law older than any government.

Nobody, Locke argued against Sir Robert Filmer, is born another’s subject: a king’s title cannot be traced to Adam, and power over free people can only be lent by their consent, as a trust that is forfeited when it is abused. Property begins the same way, without anyone’s grant, in the labour a person mixes with what lay in common. The same reasoning set him against devaluing the coin, since a stamp cannot change what was promised. He allowed slavery for captives of a just war, and the Carolina constitution he wrote out gave masters absolute power.

  • political authority
  • political legitimacy
  • consent
  • property
  • natural law
  • sovereignty
  • inheritance
  • law
  • justice
  • money
  • coinage

Conscience Beyond the Reach of Force

What may a government do about a belief it holds to be false and ruinous to the soul? Locke answers that it has neither the means nor the commission to do anything, and then names the cases where his own toleration stops.

Belief follows evidence and cannot be commanded, so a penalty can produce conformity but never conviction, and conformity without conviction saves nobody. From that Locke concluded that governments exist to protect life, liberty and possessions, and that churches are voluntary societies which people join and leave. He defended the position in three further letters against Jonas Proast, an Oxford college chaplain who wanted moderate penalties to make dissenters reflect. The freedom had edges: he refused it to those who deny God, and to churches whose members owe obedience to a foreign prince.

  • religious toleration
  • religious coercion
  • coercion
  • punishment
  • freedom of conscience
  • conscience
  • salvation
  • religious authority
  • religious belief
  • religion

By the numbers

works held
12
passages traced
4,428
concepts traced
2,083
thematic clusters
6

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “religious coercion” and “religious toleration”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 15 pairings. 93 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
religious coercionreligious toleration186
political authorityreligious coercion166
political authorityreligious toleration133
ideasknowledge117
ideasperception76
knowledgeperception27
educationknowledge26
educationreligious coercion4
educationideas2
educationpolitical authority2
educationreligious toleration2
educationperception1
knowledgepolitical authority1
knowledgereligious coercion1
moneyperception1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: religious toleration in A Letter Concerning Toleration, 68.8%.

Density 0% 68.8%

Concept density per work, chronological 12 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 76 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearreligious tolerationeducationideasknowledgeperceptionpolitical authorityreligious coercionmoney
A Letter Concerning Toleration68.8%0%0%0%0%8.8%12.5%0%
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding0%2.7%18.7%18.7%10.5%0.2%0%0%
Two Treatises of Government0%0.2%0%0.5%0%37.4%0%1.2%
Further Letters Concerning Toleration51%1.3%0%0.6%0%31.2%58.2%0%
Some Thoughts Concerning Education0%56%0%1%0.3%0%0%0%
The Reasonableness of Christianity0%1.2%0%0.8%0%10.2%0%0%
Several Papers Relating to Money, Interest and Trade0%0%0%0%0.3%0%0%56.8%
Letters to the Bishop of Worcester0.1%0.4%28.3%13.7%3.8%0%0%0%
Of the Conduct of the Understanding0%28.7%1.6%28.7%0%0%0%0%
Posthumous Works0%0%42.2%16.9%59%0%0%0%
Some Familiar Letters between Mr. Locke and Several of His Friends0%14%2.1%5.6%1.4%0%0%1.4%
A Collection of Several Pieces4.3%8.6%8.6%7.5%18.3%2.2%0%0%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

AFTER EXILE — UNDERSTANDING, GOVERNMENT, TOLERATION

  1. 1689 A Letter Concerning Toleration (Epistola de Tolerantia)

    The one statement of his case for religious freedom that Locke made briefly and to a friend. Everything else he printed on the subject defends this text against one of its critics, Jonas Proast.

    EN
  2. 1689 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

    The book Locke's reputation rests on, and the one major work of 1689 that he signed. His quarrel with Bishop Stillingfleet, the unfinished Conduct of the Understanding and the letters to William Molyneux all grow out of it.

    EN
  3. 1689 Two Treatises of Government

    Two parts of a longer manuscript whose middle was lost before printing, as Locke's preface says. The book is his political theory, and it shares a year and a purpose with A Letter Concerning Toleration: each sets a limit on what a ruler may do.

    EN
  4. 1690 Further Letters Concerning Toleration

    A sequel in three parts to A Letter Concerning Toleration: Locke's second and third letters and the fragment of a fourth, each a reply to the Oxford chaplain Jonas Proast. The third is where he tests his case hardest.

    EN

THE 1690s — EDUCATION, MONEY & RELIGION

  1. 1693 Some Thoughts Concerning Education

    Written for the household of his friend Edward Clarke and enlarged by Locke through several editions. It is his book of practical advice on raising a child, and it applies the Essay's view that the mind is formed by what it meets.

    EN
  2. 1695 The Reasonableness of Christianity

    His main work on religion, and the opening of the study of Scripture that occupied his last years. He defended it twice against John Edwards, a Cambridge Calvinist, and kept his name off all three books while he lived.

    EN
  3. 1696 Several Papers Relating to Money, Interest and Trade

    Advice written for ministers and for Parliament during the currency crisis of the 1690s, and gathered under Locke's name in 1696. The account of money behind it is sketched in the chapter on property in the Two Treatises.

    EN
  4. 1697 Letters to the Bishop of Worcester

    Locke's own commentary on the Essay, written under attack: three replies to Edward Stillingfleet, issued as separate pamphlets between 1697 and 1699, with a short answer to a second critic, Thomas Burnet, Master of the Charterhouse.

    EN

POSTHUMOUS — THE CONDUCT, LETTERS & LAST PAPERS

  1. 1706 Of the Conduct of the Understanding

    An unfinished draft, printed from Locke's papers two years after his death. It is the practical companion to the Essay and overlaps with his advice on education.

    EN
  2. 1706 Posthumous Works

    From the volume of unpublished papers that Locke's executors issued in 1706: a critique of Malebranche from the 1690s and a short discourse on miracles from 1702. Both extend arguments begun in the Essay.

    EN
  3. 1708 Some Familiar Letters between Mr. Locke and Several of His Friends

    Letters to the Molyneux brothers of Dublin — Locke's side of the correspondence — taken from a volume his publishers issued in 1708. It is the closest view of him at work on the later editions of the Essay.

    EN
  4. 1720 A Collection of Several Pieces

    The Carolina constitution of 1669 predates the Two Treatises by ten years or more, and the two are often set against each other. Pierre Des Maizeaux published it in 1720 together with shorter pieces left out of the collected works.

    EN
Begin a dialogue with John Locke

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.