Silver, Not Names, Pays Debts
Is a pound whatever the government says it is, or a fixed quantity of silver that the stamp only certifies? Every contract in the country depends on which of the two is true.
Money, for Locke, does two jobs: it counts, by its stamp and name, and it pledges, by the silver it contains. Silver was chosen because it lasts, is scarce and is hard to counterfeit, and its value in exchange is its quantity. The mint’s stamp is a public voucher for the weight. Hence his answer to Lowndes: calling a lighter coin a crown raises nothing except the name, as dividing a foot into fifteen parts makes nothing longer. What changes is who is paid. Every creditor and landlord receives less silver than his contract promised, and the state has done by law what the clippers did by stealth.
- coinage
- money
- silver
- debasement
- intrinsic value
- contracts
- justice
- measurement
- law
- value
- monetary policy
- bullion
Enter a dialogue
- Nobody can lengthen a foot by dividing it into fifteen parts and calling them inches. Why is raising the face value of a coin the same trick?
- It is silver and not names, you write, that pays debts. What happens to a landlord when the state calls a lighter coin by the old name?
- You treat the stamp on a coin as a public voucher for its silver. What does a government break when it changes the weight behind it?
- Someone lends a neighbour a hundred pounds, and the coin is devalued before it is repaid. Has the borrower, on your account, kept his promise?
- Silver’s value as money rests, you grant, on common consent. If people gave it that value by agreeing, why can a government not alter the agreement?